head to head · open source

excelize vs Contentport

excelize has 20,918 GitHub stars, 1,949 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Contentport has 765 stars, 107 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. excelize leads on adoption by 2,634% (20,918 vs 765 stars). excelize is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause; Contentport is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. excelize has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Contentport 14%. excelize was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

excelize ★ 21K Contentport ★ 765 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

excelize Contentport
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 765
License BSD-3-Clause AGPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2025-12-12
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 107
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick excelize if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full excelize profile →

pick Contentport if

  • You want the Contentport feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Contentport fits your workflow better

full Contentport profile →

About excelize

Excelize is a pure Go library for reading and writing XLAM, XLSM, XLSX, XLTM and XLTX spreadsheets, built for Go developers who need to generate or parse Microsoft Excel 2007 and later workbooks directly from their own code.

read the full excelize overview →

About Contentport

Contentport is an open source content platform for technical founders, positioned as a content engine for growing on Twitter at scale. It is written in TypeScript, licensed under AGPL 3.0, and listed under Business Software / Marketing & Customer Engagement. Its public roadmap describes scheduling, assistant prompts, thread creation, image handling, timezone behavior, and workspace isolation.

read the full Contentport overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs dbt plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

excelize vs duckdb excelize vs Krayin excelize vs Listmonk excelize vs goaccess excelize vs claude-seo excelize vs Billion Mail excelize vs BillionMail excelize vs dbt excelize vs trino excelize vs starrocks excelize vs perspective excelize vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is excelize or Contentport more popular?

excelize has 20,918 GitHub stars and Contentport has 765. excelize has the larger community by that measure.

Are excelize and Contentport free?

Both are open source. excelize is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Contentport under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between excelize and Contentport?

excelize is written in Go and Contentport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, excelize or Contentport?

Choose excelize if you want the larger community (20,918 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose Contentport if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.