head to head · open source
excelize vs Contentport
excelize has 21,036 GitHub stars, 1,984 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Contentport has 772 stars, 108 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. excelize leads on adoption by 2,625% (21,036 vs 772 stars). excelize is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause; Contentport is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. excelize has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Contentport 14%. excelize was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| excelize | Contentport | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 772 |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2025-12-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.0K | ⑂ 108 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick excelize if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Contentport if
- You want the Contentport feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Contentport fits your workflow better
About excelize
Excelize Introduction Excelize is a library written in pure Go providing a set of functions that allow you to write to and read from XLAM / XLSM / XLSX / XLTM / XLTX files. Supports reading and writing spreadsheet documents generated by Microsoft Excel™ 2007 and later. Supports complex components by high compatibility, and provided streaming API for generating or reading data from a worksheet with huge amounts of data. This library needs Go version 1.25.0 or later. The full docs can be seen using go's built in documentation tool, or online at go.dev and docs reference. Basic Usage Installation If your…
read the full excelize overview →
About Contentport
contentport — public roadmap (last updated: 29th Nov 2025) Features in Pipeline Priority 1 Dark mode (requested by many users) Responsive layout (requested by many users) Community posting (requested by many users) Proactively create posts for users (requested by many users) Native code snippet editor (Raycast style) — personal wish (Jo) Accurate character limit handling for free Twitter users (necessary for UX) Auto plug (potentially useful feature) Timezone selection (requested by many users) Clarify whether scheduled times reflect: Local timezone UTC Or something else Display the active timezone clearly…
read the full Contentport overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.
Frequently asked questions
Is excelize or Contentport more popular?
excelize has 21,036 GitHub stars and Contentport has 772. excelize has the larger community by that measure.
Are excelize and Contentport free?
Both are open source. excelize is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Contentport under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between excelize and Contentport?
excelize is written in Go and Contentport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, excelize or Contentport?
Choose excelize if you want the larger community (21,036 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose Contentport if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.