head to head · open source

etherpad vs textbus

etherpad has 18,554 GitHub stars, 3,049 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped yesterday. textbus has 1,385 stars, 145 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. etherpad leads on adoption by 1,240% (18,554 vs 1,385 stars). etherpad is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; textbus is written in TypeScript under MIT. etherpad has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, textbus 10%. etherpad was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (collaboration, collaborative-editing, collaborative-framework, rich-text-editor), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etherpad ★ 19K textbus ★ 1.4K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

etherpad textbus
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 1.4K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-06-25
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 145
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etherpad if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etherpad profile →

pick textbus if

  • You want the textbus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and textbus fits your workflow better

full textbus profile →

About etherpad

Etherpad is a real time collaborative document editor, written in TypeScript and released under Apache 2.0, for teams and institutions that need every keystroke attributed to its author, every revision preserved, and all text hosted on infrastructure they control.

read the full etherpad overview →

About textbus

Textbus is an MIT licensed, TypeScript rich text framework for front end developers who need to build component based, data driven and collaborative editors — the DingTalk Docs, Shimo Docs or Feishu Docs kind of experience — rendered with Viewfly, Vue or React.

read the full textbus overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

etherpad vs Plane etherpad vs Rocket.Chat etherpad vs cobalt etherpad vs Buzz etherpad vs Jitsi etherpad vs srs etherpad vs Huly etherpad vs Zulip etherpad vs drawnix etherpad vs univer etherpad vs chat etherpad vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is etherpad or textbus more popular?

etherpad has 18,554 GitHub stars and textbus has 1,385. etherpad has the larger community by that measure.

Are etherpad and textbus free?

Both are open source. etherpad is licensed under Apache-2.0 and textbus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etherpad and textbus?

etherpad is written in TypeScript and textbus in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etherpad or textbus?

Choose etherpad if you want the larger community (18,554 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose textbus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.