head to head · open source

etherpad vs octo-server

etherpad has 18,554 GitHub stars, 3,049 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped yesterday. octo-server has 1,059 stars, 165 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. etherpad leads on adoption by 1,652% (18,554 vs 1,059 stars). etherpad is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; octo-server is written in Go under Apache-2.0. etherpad has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, octo-server 16%. etherpad was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etherpad ★ 19K octo-server ★ 1.1K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

etherpad octo-server
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 1.1K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 165
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etherpad if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etherpad profile →

pick octo-server if

  • You want the octo-server feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and octo-server fits your workflow better

full octo-server profile →

About etherpad

Etherpad is a real time collaborative document editor, written in TypeScript and released under Apache 2.0, for teams and institutions that need every keystroke attributed to its author, every revision preserved, and all text hosted on infrastructure they control.

read the full etherpad overview →

About octo-server

octo server is the Go backend at the centre of OCTO, an open workplace built for humans and AI agents, and it is aimed at teams that want to self host a collaboration platform where Lobster agents participate in conversations as first class members.

read the full octo-server overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

etherpad vs Plane etherpad vs Rocket.Chat etherpad vs cobalt etherpad vs Buzz etherpad vs Jitsi etherpad vs srs etherpad vs Huly etherpad vs Zulip etherpad vs drawnix etherpad vs univer etherpad vs chat etherpad vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is etherpad or octo-server more popular?

etherpad has 18,554 GitHub stars and octo-server has 1,059. etherpad has the larger community by that measure.

Are etherpad and octo-server free?

Both are open source. etherpad is licensed under Apache-2.0 and octo-server under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etherpad and octo-server?

etherpad is written in TypeScript and octo-server in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etherpad or octo-server?

Choose etherpad if you want the larger community (18,554 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose octo-server if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.