head to head · open source

Ente vs Phase

Ente has 28,969 GitHub stars, 1,806 forks, 229 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Phase has 923 stars, 70 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Ente leads on adoption by 3,039% (28,969 vs 923 stars). Ente is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0; Phase is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Ente has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Phase 8%. Ente was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (end-to-end-encryption), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ente ★ 29K Phase ★ 923 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ente Phase
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 923
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in Dart TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 70
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ente if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ente profile →

pick Phase if

  • You want the Phase feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Phase fits your workflow better

full Phase profile →

About Ente

Ente is a fully open source, end to end encrypted platform for storing photos, documents and credentials in the cloud, packaged as a monorepo of client apps and a server, and intended for people who want the features of Google Photos, Apple Photos and Authy without having to trust the service provider with their data.

read the full Ente overview →

About Phase

Phase is an open source secrets management platform, written in TypeScript, that lets fast moving engineering teams secure, deploy, and manage application secrets and environment variables from development through to production.

read the full Phase overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs phase puter vs ente mattermost vs ente signal vs ente payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal mattermost vs signal mattermost vs zulip supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Ente vs Puter Ente vs Mattermost Ente vs Signal Ente vs Element Ente vs Fluxer Ente vs certificates Ente vs Tuta Ente vs Zen Ente vs Cinny Ente vs Certipy Ente vs Stoat Ente vs Quiet

Frequently asked questions

Is Ente or Phase more popular?

Ente has 28,969 GitHub stars and Phase has 923. Ente has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ente and Phase free?

Both are open source. Ente is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and Phase has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Ente and Phase?

Ente is written in Dart and Phase in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ente or Phase?

Choose Ente if you want the larger community (28,969 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Phase if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.