head to head · open source

Ente vs AutomatedLab

Ente has 28,956 GitHub stars, 1,805 forks, 229 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AutomatedLab has 2,226 stars, 383 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Ente leads on adoption by 1,201% (28,956 vs 2,226 stars). Ente is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0; AutomatedLab is written in PowerShell under MIT. Ente has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, AutomatedLab 17%. Ente was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ente ★ 29K AutomatedLab ★ 2.2K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ente AutomatedLab
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 2.2K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Dart PowerShell
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-07-06
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 383
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ente if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ente profile →

pick AutomatedLab if

  • You want the AutomatedLab feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PowerShell
  • You evaluated both and AutomatedLab fits your workflow better

full AutomatedLab profile →

About Ente

Ente is a fully open source, end to end encrypted platform for storing photos, documents and credentials in the cloud, packaged as a monorepo of client apps and a server, and intended for people who want the features of Google Photos, Apple Photos and Authy without having to trust the service provider with their data.

read the full Ente overview →

About AutomatedLab

AutomatedLab is an MIT licensed PowerShell provisioning framework that deploys complex lab environments — Windows domain controllers, Exchange, PKI, IIS and Linux guests — on Hyper V or Azure from simple scripts, built for IT admins, testers and trainers who need full multi VM labs on demand.

read the full AutomatedLab overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs ente mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal mattermost vs signal mattermost vs zulip supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Ente vs Puter Ente vs Mattermost Ente vs Signal Ente vs Element Ente vs Fluxer Ente vs certificates Ente vs Tuta Ente vs Zen Ente vs Cinny Ente vs Certipy Ente vs Stoat Ente vs Quiet

Frequently asked questions

Is Ente or AutomatedLab more popular?

Ente has 28,956 GitHub stars and AutomatedLab has 2,226. Ente has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ente and AutomatedLab free?

Both are open source. Ente is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and AutomatedLab under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ente and AutomatedLab?

Ente is written in Dart and AutomatedLab in PowerShell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ente or AutomatedLab?

Choose Ente if you want the larger community (28,956 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose AutomatedLab if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.