head to head · open source

Element vs ejbca-ce

Element has 13,481 GitHub stars, 2,758 forks, 3,779 open issues and last shipped today. ejbca-ce has 952 stars, 160 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Element leads on adoption by 1,316% (13,481 vs 952 stars). Element is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; ejbca-ce is written in Java under LGPL-2.1. Element has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, ejbca-ce 17%. Element was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Element ★ 13K ejbca-ce ★ 952 category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Element ejbca-ce
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 952
License AGPL-3.0 LGPL-2.1
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 160
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Element if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Element profile →

pick ejbca-ce if

  • You want the ejbca-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-2.1 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and ejbca-ce fits your workflow better

full ejbca-ce profile →

About Element

Element is a Matrix collaboration client for the web and desktop, and its tagline describes it as secure, decentralized messaging for teams and individuals. It is built with the Matrix JS SDK and lives in the Matrix ecosystem as an open alternative to Slack and Google Meet.

read the full Element overview →

About ejbca-ce

EJBCA Community Edition is an LGPL licensed, Java based public key infrastructure and certificate authority package for anyone who wants to learn, test, or prototype certificate and PKI workflows without committing to a commercial PKI product.

read the full ejbca-ce overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Element vs Puter Element vs Mattermost Element vs Signal Element vs Ente Element vs Fluxer Element vs certificates Element vs Tuta Element vs Zen Element vs Cinny Element vs Certipy Element vs Stoat Element vs Quiet

Frequently asked questions

Is Element or ejbca-ce more popular?

Element has 13,481 GitHub stars and ejbca-ce has 952. Element has the larger community by that measure.

Are Element and ejbca-ce free?

Both are open source. Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ejbca-ce under LGPL-2.1. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Element and ejbca-ce?

Element is written in TypeScript and ejbca-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Element or ejbca-ce?

Choose Element if you want the larger community (13,481 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ejbca-ce if its feature set, stack or LGPL-2.1 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.