head to head · open source
edict vs xlings
edict has 16,903 GitHub stars, 1,769 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. xlings has 607 stars, 49 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. edict leads on adoption by 2,685% (16,903 vs 607 stars). edict is written in Python under MIT; xlings is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. edict has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, xlings 8%. xlings was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| edict | xlings | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 17K | ★ 607 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 49 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick edict if
- You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick xlings if
- You want the xlings feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and xlings fits your workflow better
About edict
Edict is an MIT licensed Python orchestration system that runs multi agent LLM work through the Tang dynasty Three Departments and Six Ministries, splitting the job across eleven business roles plus one compatibility role so that planning, review, dispatch, and execution are handled by separate agents, and it is built for teams running OpenClaw that need every hand off between agents to be reviewable, auditable, and interruptible.
read the full edict overview →
About xlings
xlings Universal package infrastructure with OS like SubOS isolation. Multi version · Rootless · Decentralized Index · Agent ready. [Website] [Docs] [Package Index] [Forum] 中文 English [Website]: [Docs]: docs/ [Package Index]: [Forum]: Used by: MCPP · upcoming Luban Linux Why xlings? One tool to install any version of anything, run it rootless, and isolate it OS like — across Linux, macOS, and Windows. "Supported" is three separate questions, so here are three columns. A platform xlings runs on is not automatically a platform every package has an artifact for, and neither of those says anything about how much isol…
read the full xlings overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is edict or xlings more popular?
edict has 16,903 GitHub stars and xlings has 607. edict has the larger community by that measure.
Are edict and xlings free?
Both are open source. edict is licensed under MIT and xlings under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between edict and xlings?
edict is written in Python and xlings in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, edict or xlings?
Choose edict if you want the larger community (16,903 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xlings if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.