head to head · open source
edict vs lotti
edict has 16,900 GitHub stars, 1,769 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. lotti has 1,175 stars, 118 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. edict leads on adoption by 1,338% (16,900 vs 1,175 stars). edict is written in Python under MIT; lotti is written in Dart under GPL-3.0. edict has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, lotti 10%. lotti was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| edict | lotti | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 17K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Dart |
| Last push | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 118 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick edict if
- You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick lotti if
- You want the lotti feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Dart
- You evaluated both and lotti fits your workflow better
About edict
Edict is an MIT licensed Python orchestration system that runs multi agent LLM work through the Tang dynasty Three Departments and Six Ministries, splitting the job across eleven business roles plus one compatibility role so that planning, review, dispatch, and execution are handled by separate agents, and it is built for teams running OpenClaw that need every hand off between agents to be reviewable, auditable, and interruptible.
read the full edict overview →
About lotti
Lotti is an open source, end to end encrypted logbook for individuals who want a private, local first record of the work they actually did, staffed by persistent AI agents that read what is recorded and propose the next change for the user to approve.
read the full lotti overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is edict or lotti more popular?
edict has 16,900 GitHub stars and lotti has 1,175. edict has the larger community by that measure.
Are edict and lotti free?
Both are open source. edict is licensed under MIT and lotti under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between edict and lotti?
edict is written in Python and lotti in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, edict or lotti?
Choose edict if you want the larger community (16,900 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lotti if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.