head to head · open source

edict vs CommunityServer

edict has 16,900 GitHub stars, 1,769 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. CommunityServer has 3,166 stars, 672 forks, 206 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. edict leads on adoption by 434% (16,900 vs 3,166 stars). edict is written in Python under MIT; CommunityServer is written in C# under Apache-2.0. edict has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, CommunityServer 21%. edict was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

edict ★ 17K CommunityServer ★ 3.2K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

edict CommunityServer
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 3.2K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python C#
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-05-05
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 672
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick edict if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full edict profile →

pick CommunityServer if

  • You want the CommunityServer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and CommunityServer fits your workflow better

full CommunityServer profile →

About edict

Edict is an MIT licensed Python orchestration system that runs multi agent LLM work through the Tang dynasty Three Departments and Six Ministries, splitting the job across eleven business roles plus one compatibility role so that planning, review, dispatch, and execution are handled by separate agents, and it is built for teams running OpenClaw that need every hand off between agents to be reviewable, auditable, and interruptible.

read the full edict overview →

About CommunityServer

CommunityServer, now distributed as ONLYOFFICE Groups from version 11.0, is a free open source collaborative platform written in C and licensed under Apache 2.0. It lives in the ONLYOFFICE Workspace ecosystem and acts as a central hub for documents, projects, clients, and email accounts.

read the full CommunityServer overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs planka vibe-kanban vs leantime plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

edict vs vibe-kanban edict vs Wekan edict vs qinglong edict vs OpenProject edict vs onedev edict vs Planka edict vs Leantime edict vs kanboard edict vs Kaneo edict vs ccpm edict vs Fizzy edict vs Backlog.md

Frequently asked questions

Is edict or CommunityServer more popular?

edict has 16,900 GitHub stars and CommunityServer has 3,166. edict has the larger community by that measure.

Are edict and CommunityServer free?

Both are open source. edict is licensed under MIT and CommunityServer under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between edict and CommunityServer?

edict is written in Python and CommunityServer in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, edict or CommunityServer?

Choose edict if you want the larger community (16,900 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose CommunityServer if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.