head to head · open source
edict vs Argus
edict has 17,056 GitHub stars, 1,765 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Argus has 1,236 stars, 56 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. edict leads on adoption by 1,280% (17,056 vs 1,236 stars). edict is written in Python under MIT; Argus is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. edict has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Argus 5%. Argus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| edict | Argus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 17K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-28 | 2026-11-10 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 56 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick edict if
- You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Argus if
- You want the Argus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and Argus fits your workflow better
About edict
⚔️ 三省六部 · Edict 我用 1300 年前的帝国制度，重新设计了 AI 多 Agent 协作架构。 结果发现，古人比现代 AI 框架更懂分权制衡。 12 个 AI Agent（11 个业务角色 + 1 个兼容角色）组成三省六部：太子分拣、中书省规划、门下省审核封驳、尚书省派发、六部+吏部并行执行。 比 CrewAI 多一层 制度性审核 ，比 AutoGen 多一个 实时看板 。 🎬 看 Demo · 🚀 30 秒体验 · 🏛️ 架构 · 📋 看板功能 · 📚 架构文档 · English · 日本語 · 参与贡献 🎬 Demo 您的浏览器不支持视频播放，请查看下方 GIF 或 下载视频 。 🎥 三省六部 AI 多 Agent 协作全流程演示 📸 GIF 预览（加载更快） 飞书下旨 → 太子分拣 → 中书省规划 → 门下省审议 → 六部并行执行 → 奏折回报（30 秒） 🐳 没有 OpenClaw？ 跑一行 docker run p 7891:7891 cft0808/edict 即可体验完整看板 Demo（预置模拟数据）。 🤔 为什么是三省六部？ 大多数 Multi Agent 框架的套路是： "来，你们几个 AI 自己聊，聊完把结果给我。" 然后你拿到一坨不知道经过了什么处理的结果，无法复现，无法审计，无法干预。 三省六部的思路完全不同 —— 我们用了一个在中国存在 1400…
read the full edict overview →
About Argus
Argus 快速、现代、信息丰富的 Windows 任务管理器 阅读语言： 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · English · Español · Deutsch · 日本語 · Français · Русский 在官方网站可直接在浏览器中交互体验完整界面与功能导览，无需下载安装 官网与在线体验 · 特性 · 下载 · 从源码构建 · 快捷键 · 文档 · 交流与反馈 · 语言指引 Argus 采用 Rust 直接调用 Windows 原生接口，基于 GPUI Kit 原生组件构建界面，图表曲线随屏幕刷新率连续流动。项目名称取自希腊神话中的百眼巨人阿尔戈斯（Argus Panoptes）。 🌍 语言指引 页面顶部可切换 README 阅读语言。软件界面语言可在 设置 → 语言与外观 → 界面语言 中单独选择，默认跟随 Windows 显示语言。 官网页面与交互演示提供上述八种语言，详细文档使用简体中文。更新日志保留简体中文与英文两份：繁体中文页面回退为简体中文，其余新增语言回退为英文。 ⭐ Star 趋势 如果 Argus 对日常使用有所帮助，欢迎在 GitHub 上点亮 Star。这是对项目最直接的支持，也能让更多人发现它。 ✨ 特性 📦 下载 在官网下载页获取最新稳定版和 SHA 256 校验值。全部版本见 GitHub Releases。 代码签名策略（Code signing policy） · 隐私策略…
read the full Argus overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is edict or Argus more popular?
edict has 17,056 GitHub stars and Argus has 1,236. edict has the larger community by that measure.
Are edict and Argus free?
Both are open source. edict is licensed under MIT and Argus under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between edict and Argus?
edict is written in Python and Argus in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, edict or Argus?
Choose edict if you want the larger community (17,056 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Argus if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.