head to head · open source

excelize vs duckdb-wasm

excelize has 20,924 GitHub stars, 1,954 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped today. duckdb-wasm has 2,121 stars, 227 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. excelize leads on adoption by 887% (20,924 vs 2,121 stars). excelize is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause; duckdb-wasm is written in C++ under MIT. excelize has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, duckdb-wasm 11%. excelize was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

excelize ★ 21K duckdb-wasm ★ 2.1K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

excelize duckdb-wasm
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 2.1K
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
Written in Go C++
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-07-28
Forks ⑂ 2.0K ⑂ 227
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick excelize if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full excelize profile →

pick duckdb-wasm if

  • You want the duckdb-wasm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and duckdb-wasm fits your workflow better

full duckdb-wasm profile →

About excelize

Excelize is a pure Go library for reading and writing XLAM, XLSM, XLSX, XLTM and XLTX spreadsheets, built for Go developers who need to generate or parse Microsoft Excel 2007 and later workbooks directly from their own code.

read the full excelize overview →

About duckdb-wasm

DuckDB Wasm is the WebAssembly build of DuckDB, an in process SQL OLAP database management system, that runs analytical SQL queries entirely inside a web browser or a Node.js process — built for front end developers and data engineers who want full OLAP query power on data that already sits on the client, without standing up a server.

read the full duckdb-wasm overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs mysql opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

excelize vs duckdb excelize vs Krayin excelize vs Listmonk excelize vs goaccess excelize vs claude-seo excelize vs Billion Mail excelize vs BillionMail excelize vs dbt excelize vs trino excelize vs starrocks excelize vs perspective excelize vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is excelize or duckdb-wasm more popular?

excelize has 20,924 GitHub stars and duckdb-wasm has 2,121. excelize has the larger community by that measure.

Are excelize and duckdb-wasm free?

Both are open source. excelize is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and duckdb-wasm under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between excelize and duckdb-wasm?

excelize is written in Go and duckdb-wasm in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, excelize or duckdb-wasm?

Choose excelize if you want the larger community (20,924 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose duckdb-wasm if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.