head to head · open source

duckdb-wasm vs clickvisual

duckdb-wasm has 2,121 GitHub stars, 227 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. clickvisual has 1,643 stars, 238 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. duckdb-wasm leads on adoption by 29% (2,121 vs 1,643 stars). duckdb-wasm is written in C++ under MIT; clickvisual is written in Go under MIT. duckdb-wasm has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, clickvisual 14%. clickvisual was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

duckdb-wasm ★ 2.1K clickvisual ★ 1.6K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

duckdb-wasm clickvisual
GitHub stars ★ 2.1K ★ 1.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in C++ Go
Last push 2026-07-28 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 227 ⑂ 238
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick duckdb-wasm if

  • You weight community size — 2.1K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full duckdb-wasm profile →

pick clickvisual if

  • You want the clickvisual feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and clickvisual fits your workflow better

full clickvisual profile →

About duckdb-wasm

DuckDB Wasm is the WebAssembly build of DuckDB, an in process SQL OLAP database management system, that runs analytical SQL queries entirely inside a web browser or a Node.js process — built for front end developers and data engineers who want full OLAP query power on data that already sits on the client, without standing up a server.

read the full duckdb-wasm overview →

About clickvisual

ClickVisual is a lightweight, browser based log analytics and log search platform for ClickHouse, aimed at teams that already store their logs in ClickHouse and want querying, dashboards, and alerting without operating a full Elasticsearch stack.

read the full clickvisual overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs mysql opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

duckdb-wasm vs duckdb duckdb-wasm vs Krayin duckdb-wasm vs Listmonk duckdb-wasm vs goaccess duckdb-wasm vs excelize duckdb-wasm vs claude-seo duckdb-wasm vs Billion Mail duckdb-wasm vs BillionMail duckdb-wasm vs dbt duckdb-wasm vs trino duckdb-wasm vs starrocks duckdb-wasm vs perspective

Frequently asked questions

Is duckdb-wasm or clickvisual more popular?

duckdb-wasm has 2,121 GitHub stars and clickvisual has 1,643. duckdb-wasm has the larger community by that measure.

Are duckdb-wasm and clickvisual free?

Both are open source. duckdb-wasm is licensed under MIT and clickvisual under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between duckdb-wasm and clickvisual?

duckdb-wasm is written in C++ and clickvisual in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, duckdb-wasm or clickvisual?

Choose duckdb-wasm if you want the larger community (2,121 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose clickvisual if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.