head to head · open source
docusaurus vs leafwiki
docusaurus has 66,641 GitHub stars, 10,125 forks, 430 open issues and last shipped yesterday. leafwiki has 1,213 stars, 102 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped yesterday. docusaurus leads on adoption by 5,394% (66,641 vs 1,213 stars). docusaurus is written in TypeScript under MIT; leafwiki is written in Go under MIT. docusaurus has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, leafwiki 8%. leafwiki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (documentation, react), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| docusaurus | leafwiki | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 10K | ⑂ 102 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick docusaurus if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick leafwiki if
- You want the leafwiki feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and leafwiki fits your workflow better
About docusaurus
Docusaurus Introduction Docusaurus is a project for building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites easily. Short on time? Check out our 5 minute tutorial ⏱️! Tip : use docusaurus.new to test Docusaurus immediately in a playground. Simple to Start Docusaurus is built in a way so that it can get running in as little time as possible. We've built Docusaurus to handle the website build process so you can focus on your project. Localizable Docusaurus ships with localization support via CrowdIn. Empower and grow your international community by translating your documentation. Customizable While…
read the full docusaurus overview →
About leafwiki
🌿 LeafWiki Self hosted wiki. Single Go binary. SQLite + Markdown stored on disk. For engineers and self hosters who want structured, long lived documentation. No Node.js, no Redis, no Postgres — just a binary and a data directory. If you've looked at Wiki.js or Outline and thought "this is too much to operate for what I need" — this could fit for you. → Try it without installing: demo.leafwiki.com · Ctrl+E edit · Ctrl+S save · resets hourly → If it fits, a star helps others find it. → All install options (Docker Compose, Linux installer, binary) Table of Contents Features Good fit / not a fit Install Docker…
read the full leafwiki overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.
Frequently asked questions
Is docusaurus or leafwiki more popular?
docusaurus has 66,641 GitHub stars and leafwiki has 1,213. docusaurus has the larger community by that measure.
Are docusaurus and leafwiki free?
Both are open source. docusaurus is licensed under MIT and leafwiki under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between docusaurus and leafwiki?
docusaurus is written in TypeScript and leafwiki in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, docusaurus or leafwiki?
Choose docusaurus if you want the larger community (66,641 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose leafwiki if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.