head to head · open source
docsify vs wandao
docsify has 31,513 GitHub stars, 5,789 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wandao has 1,158 stars, 139 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. docsify leads on adoption by 2,621% (31,513 vs 1,158 stars). docsify is written in JavaScript under MIT; wandao is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. docsify has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, wandao 12%. wandao was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (markdown), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| docsify | wandao | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.8K | ⑂ 139 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick docsify if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wandao if
- You want the wandao feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and wandao fits your workflow better
About docsify
Docsify is a client side documentation site generator that turns one or more Markdown files into a website with no build process, aimed at developers and maintainers who want to publish documentation from a static host such as GitHub Pages.
read the full docsify overview →
About wandao
万能导 Wandao ✨ 让知识没有壁垒，让多平台文档迁移更简单。 将你有权访问的知识库导出为本地 Markdown，或把本地 Markdown 导入其他平台。 尽量保留目录结构、正文格式、图片与附件，告别重复复制和手动整理。 📦 下载最新版 · 📖 使用教程 · 🧠 AI 辅助学习 · 🐛 反馈问题 · 🤝 参与共创 万能导是一个多平台知识库 Markdown 导入导出工具，目前支持飞书、语雀、阿里云 Thoughts、印象笔记、有道云笔记、为知笔记、OneNote、知识星球、ima 知识库、钉钉文档、WPS 文档、息流、Obsidian、Notion、知乎、CSDN、微信公众号和本地 Markdown 等内容来源与目标平台。 你可以把自己有权限访问的项目资料、团队知识库和课程文档导出为本地 Markdown，也可以把整理好的本地 Markdown 导入到支持的平台。万能导重点处理文档格式、图片、附件和目录层级，适合知识备份、平台迁移、学习资料整理，以及将“教学文档 + 源码项目”交给 AI 一起阅读。 如果有未能完整导出的内容或希望支持的新平台，欢迎提交 GitHub Issue。建议新平台不要求参与开发，平台使用经验、公开资料和测试意愿同样有价值；每一条可复现的反馈和共创需求都会被认真审查。 如果这个项目对你有帮助，欢迎在 GitHub 点一个 Star ⭐,这对我真的很重要 💗 特别赞助 Fluxio…
read the full wandao overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.
Frequently asked questions
Is docsify or wandao more popular?
docsify has 31,513 GitHub stars and wandao has 1,158. docsify has the larger community by that measure.
Are docsify and wandao free?
Both are open source. docsify is licensed under MIT and wandao under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between docsify and wandao?
docsify is written in JavaScript and wandao in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, docsify or wandao?
Choose docsify if you want the larger community (31,513 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose wandao if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.