head to head · open source

Huly vs docker-jitsi-meet

Huly has 27,724 GitHub stars, 2,159 forks, 849 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. docker-jitsi-meet has 3,607 stars, 1,579 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Huly leads on adoption by 669% (27,724 vs 3,607 stars). Huly is written in TypeScript under EPL-2.0; docker-jitsi-meet is written in Lua under Apache-2.0. Huly has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, docker-jitsi-meet 44%. Huly was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Huly ★ 28K docker-jitsi-meet ★ 3.6K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Huly docker-jitsi-meet
GitHub stars ★ 28K ★ 3.6K
License EPL-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Lua
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Huly if

  • You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
  • You want the EPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Huly profile →

pick docker-jitsi-meet if

  • You want the docker-jitsi-meet feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You evaluated both and docker-jitsi-meet fits your workflow better

full docker-jitsi-meet profile →

About Huly

Huly is an open source, EPL 2.0 licensed, TypeScript built all in one work platform that folds project management, issue tracking, chat, CRM, HRM and applicant tracking into one system teams can run on their own servers, aimed at organisations that want the ground Jira, Linear, ClickUp, Slack and Notion cover without renting it from five separate vendors.

read the full Huly overview →

About docker-jitsi-meet

docker jitsi meet is the Docker packaging project for Jitsi Meet, a fully encrypted, open source video conferencing solution. It provides the tools needed to run a Jitsi Meet stack on Docker with Docker Compose, so teams can host secure video meetings inside their own infrastructure. The project lives in the Jitsi ecosystem and publishes its images through the GitHub Container Registry.

read the full docker-jitsi-meet overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

plane vs huly plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Huly vs Plane Huly vs Rocket.Chat Huly vs cobalt Huly vs Buzz Huly vs Jitsi Huly vs srs Huly vs Zulip Huly vs etherpad Huly vs drawnix Huly vs univer Huly vs chat Huly vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is Huly or docker-jitsi-meet more popular?

Huly has 27,724 GitHub stars and docker-jitsi-meet has 3,607. Huly has the larger community by that measure.

Are Huly and docker-jitsi-meet free?

Both are open source. Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0 and docker-jitsi-meet under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Huly and docker-jitsi-meet?

Huly is written in TypeScript and docker-jitsi-meet in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Huly or docker-jitsi-meet?

Choose Huly if you want the larger community (27,724 stars) or its EPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose docker-jitsi-meet if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.