head to head · open source

Dify vs UltraRAG

Dify has 156,215 GitHub stars, 24,668 forks, 1,067 open issues and last shipped today. UltraRAG has 5,699 stars, 448 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Dify leads on adoption by 2,641% (156,215 vs 5,699 stars). Dify is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; UltraRAG is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Dify has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, UltraRAG 8%. Dify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (deepseek, gpt, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Dify ★ 156K UltraRAG ★ 5.7K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Dify UltraRAG
GitHub stars ★ 156K ★ 5.7K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 25K ⑂ 448
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Dify if

  • You weight community size — 156K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Dify profile →

pick UltraRAG if

  • You want the UltraRAG feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and UltraRAG fits your workflow better

full UltraRAG profile →

About Dify

Dify is an open source LLM application development platform built in TypeScript. It provides a visual interface for designing, testing, and deploying AI workflows, RAG pipelines, and agentic systems without writing extensive code. The platform lives in the generative AI development ecosystem and targets teams needing to move from prototype to production using consistent tooling across environments.

read the full Dify overview →

About UltraRAG

UltraRAG is a low code Python framework that builds complex retrieval augmented generation pipelines by standardising RAG components as independent Model Context Protocol servers, aimed at researchers and teams doing industrial prototyping.

read the full UltraRAG overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K ponytail ★ 141K

Related comparisons

dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail dify vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow langchain vs ponytail langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

Dify vs langchain Dify vs ponytail Dify vs generative-ai-for-beginners Dify vs graphify Dify vs claude-mem Dify vs ragflow Dify vs PaddleOCR Dify vs Agent-Reach Dify vs headroom Dify vs Mem0 Dify vs daily_stock_analysis Dify vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is Dify or UltraRAG more popular?

Dify has 156,215 GitHub stars and UltraRAG has 5,699. Dify has the larger community by that measure.

Are Dify and UltraRAG free?

Both are open source. Dify has no licence declared in this registry, and UltraRAG is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Dify and UltraRAG?

Dify is written in TypeScript and UltraRAG in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Dify or UltraRAG?

Choose Dify if you want the larger community (156,215 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose UltraRAG if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.