head to head · open source

Dify vs ragflow

Dify has 156,167 GitHub stars, 24,658 forks, 1,067 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ragflow has 90,889 stars, 10,759 forks, 1,525 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Dify leads on adoption by 72% (156,167 vs 90,889 stars). Dify is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; ragflow is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Dify has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, ragflow 12%. Dify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agentic-ai, ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Dify ★ 156K ragflow ★ 91K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Dify ragflow
GitHub stars ★ 156K ★ 91K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 25K ⑂ 11K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Dify if

  • You weight community size — 156K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Dify profile →

pick ragflow if

  • You want the ragflow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and ragflow fits your workflow better

full ragflow profile →

About Dify

Dify is an open source LLM application development platform built in TypeScript. It provides a visual interface for designing, testing, and deploying AI workflows, RAG pipelines, and agentic systems without writing extensive code. The platform lives in the generative AI development ecosystem and targets teams needing to move from prototype to production using consistent tooling across environments.

read the full Dify overview →

About ragflow

RAGFlow is an open source Retrieval Augmented Generation engine that fuses RAG with agent capabilities into a context layer for large language models, built for developers and teams that need to turn complex, unstructured documents into production AI systems.

read the full ragflow overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K ponytail ★ 141K

Related comparisons

dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail dify vs graphify dify vs claude-mem langchain vs ponytail langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse strix vs shannon

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

Dify vs langchain Dify vs ponytail Dify vs generative-ai-for-beginners Dify vs graphify Dify vs claude-mem Dify vs PaddleOCR Dify vs Agent-Reach Dify vs headroom Dify vs Mem0 Dify vs daily_stock_analysis Dify vs LiteLLM Dify vs Multica

Frequently asked questions

Is Dify or ragflow more popular?

Dify has 156,167 GitHub stars and ragflow has 90,889. Dify has the larger community by that measure.

Are Dify and ragflow free?

Both are open source. Dify has no licence declared in this registry, and ragflow is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Dify and ragflow?

Dify is written in TypeScript and ragflow in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Dify or ragflow?

Choose Dify if you want the larger community (156,167 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose ragflow if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.