head to head · open source

devdocs vs atomic

devdocs has 39,462 GitHub stars, 2,643 forks, 196 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. atomic has 1,954 stars, 141 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. devdocs leads on adoption by 1,920% (39,462 vs 1,954 stars). devdocs is written in Ruby under MPL-2.0; atomic is written in Rust under MIT. devdocs has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, atomic 7%. devdocs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

devdocs ★ 39K atomic ★ 2.0K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

devdocs atomic
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 2.0K
License MPL-2.0 MIT
Written in Ruby Rust
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-08-09
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 141
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick devdocs if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full devdocs profile →

pick atomic if

  • You want the atomic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and atomic fits your workflow better

full atomic profile →

About devdocs

DevDocs is an API documentation browser that combines multiple developer documentations into a single, clean and organized web UI with instant search, offline support, a mobile version, a dark theme and keyboard shortcuts, and it is aimed at developers who need to read and search API and reference documentation quickly.

read the full devdocs overview →

About atomic

☁️ Atomic Cloud — Atomic, hosted at your own subdomain. Try it out for free. Everything below still self hosts forever. A personal knowledge base that turns markdown notes into a semantically connected, AI augmented knowledge graph. Atomic stores knowledge as atoms — markdown notes that are automatically chunked, embedded, tagged, and linked by semantic similarity. Your atoms can be synthesized into wiki articles, explored on a spatial canvas, and queried through an agentic chat interface. Wiki synthesis — LLM generated articles with inline citations Canvas — view your knowledge on an interactive graph Semantic s…

read the full atomic overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

devdocs vs storybook devdocs vs Understand-Anything devdocs vs docsify devdocs vs wiki devdocs vs mkdocs-material devdocs vs BookStack devdocs vs deepwiki-open devdocs vs Docs devdocs vs jsdoc devdocs vs Skill_Seekers devdocs vs gollum devdocs vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is devdocs or atomic more popular?

devdocs has 39,462 GitHub stars and atomic has 1,954. devdocs has the larger community by that measure.

Are devdocs and atomic free?

Both are open source. devdocs is licensed under MPL-2.0 and atomic under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between devdocs and atomic?

devdocs is written in Ruby and atomic in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, devdocs or atomic?

Choose devdocs if you want the larger community (39,462 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose atomic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.