head to head · open source

hugo vs decap-cms

hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars, 8,447 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. decap-cms has 19,461 stars, 3,139 forks, 593 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. hugo leads on adoption by 364% (90,326 vs 19,461 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; decap-cms is written in JavaScript under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, decap-cms 16%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cms, content-management-system), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hugo ★ 90K decap-cms ★ 19K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

hugo decap-cms
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 19K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-01
Forks ⑂ 8.4K ⑂ 3.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hugo if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hugo profile →

pick decap-cms if

  • You want the decap-cms feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and decap-cms fits your workflow better

full decap-cms profile →

About hugo

[Clang]: [GCC]: [Git]: [Go]: [bep]: [bugs]: [contributing]: CONTRIBUTING.md [create a proposal]: [dart sass]: [details]: [documentation repository]: [documentation]: [dragonfly bsd, freebsd, netbsd, and openbsd]: [features]: [forum]: [friends]: [hugo modules]: [installation]: [issue queue]: [linux]: [macos]: [prebuilt binary]: [requesting help]: [spf13]: [static site generator]: [support]: [themes]: [transpile sass to css]: [website]: [windows]: A fast and flexible static site generator built with love by [bep][], [spf13][], and [friends][] in Go. [Website][] [Installation][] [Documentation][] [Support][]…

read the full hugo overview →

About decap-cms

Documentation: decapcms.org A CMS for static site generators. Give teams a simple way to edit and add content to any site built with a static site generator. Decap CMS is the new name of Netlify CMS since February 2023. Join us on Discord for community chat. How It Works Decap CMS is a single page app that you pull into the /admin part of your site. It presents a clean UI for editing content stored in a Git repository. You setup a YAML config to describe the content model of your site, and typically tweak the main layout of the CMS a bit to fit your own site. When a user navigates to /admin/ they'll be prompted…

read the full decap-cms overview →

More in Content & Publishing

Related comparisons

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

Frequently asked questions

Is hugo or decap-cms more popular?

hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars and decap-cms has 19,461. hugo has the larger community by that measure.

Are hugo and decap-cms free?

Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and decap-cms under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hugo and decap-cms?

hugo is written in Go and decap-cms in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hugo or decap-cms?

Choose hugo if you want the larger community (90,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose decap-cms if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.