head to head · open source

daily vs social-media-copilot

daily has 20,129 GitHub stars, 575 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. social-media-copilot has 1,395 stars, 229 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. daily leads on adoption by 1,343% (20,129 vs 1,395 stars). daily is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; social-media-copilot is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. daily has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, social-media-copilot 16%. daily was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-extension, chrome-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

daily ★ 20K social-media-copilot ★ 1.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

daily social-media-copilot
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 1.4K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-08-31
Forks ⑂ 575 ⑂ 229
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick daily if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full daily profile →

pick social-media-copilot if

  • You want the social-media-copilot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and social-media-copilot fits your workflow better

full social-media-copilot profile →

About daily

Welcome to the daily.dev repository We know how hard it is to be a developer. It doesn't have to be. daily.dev is the homepage every developer deserves. A personalized developer news feed, dev communities, and search. Free, and open source. Much better than what's out there. Maybe ;) [Product Docs][product docs link] · [Changelog][changelog link] · [Report a Bug][report bug link] · [Request a Feature][github discussions link] · [Swag Store][swag store link] · [Brand Assets][brand book link] [![][chrome users shield]][chrome users link] [![][chrome rating shield]][chrome users link] [![][latest version…

read the full daily overview →

About social-media-copilot

社媒助手 日常工作中,经常会有从需要各社媒平台采集数据的场景,在使用量不大的情况下,手动处理,太麻烦;用其他产品,可能很贵或需要自己配置非常复杂的开发环境。 所以,本人开发了社媒助手插件,只需在浏览器上安装此插件,即可实现数据采集的自给自足。无需进行任何额外的操作! 目前开源版支持的平台有小红书、抖音、快手,其他平台敬请期待! 版本说明 插件目前共分为三个版本,分别是商店版、开源版、server版 其中, 商店版 功能最全面,但是不开源。 开源版 和 server版 均开源。 商店版安装地址: 开源版安装地址: 商店版 商店版拥有最完整的功能,开箱即用,优先维护,但是不开源。目前支持的平台有小红书、抖音、哔哩哔哩、快手、TikTok等。 server版 通过API进行调用,且支持自定义部署,维护于server分支中,适合需要通过API获取数据的用户。 该分支 服务器端 对外提供 HTTP 服务,通过socket.io将请求代理到 插件端 ,由插件端发起实际请求并将结果回调给 服务器端 。 开源版(当前分支) 基于社媒助手 v0.x 版本的代码进行开源,维护于main分支中,会做一些基础功能的维护,供大家学习交流使用。 开源版目前支持的主要功能如下: 项目结构 功能说明 点击查看抖音功能说明 点击查看小红书功能说明 快速开始 项目运行需要 NodeJS ,请自行安装运行环境。

read the full social-media-copilot overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Frequently asked questions

Is daily or social-media-copilot more popular?

daily has 20,129 GitHub stars and social-media-copilot has 1,395. daily has the larger community by that measure.

Are daily and social-media-copilot free?

Both are open source. daily is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and social-media-copilot under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between daily and social-media-copilot?

daily is written in JavaScript and social-media-copilot in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, daily or social-media-copilot?

Choose daily if you want the larger community (20,129 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose social-media-copilot if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.