head to head · open source
daily vs Library-Detector-for-Chrome
daily has 20,111 GitHub stars, 571 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Library-Detector-for-Chrome has 680 stars, 114 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. daily leads on adoption by 2,858% (20,111 vs 680 stars). daily is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; Library-Detector-for-Chrome is written in JavaScript under MIT. daily has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, Library-Detector-for-Chrome 17%. daily was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| daily | Library-Detector-for-Chrome | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 20K | ★ 680 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 571 | ⑂ 114 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick daily if
- You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Library-Detector-for-Chrome if
- You want the Library-Detector-for-Chrome feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and Library-Detector-for-Chrome fits your workflow better
About daily
Welcome to the daily.dev repository We know how hard it is to be a developer. It doesn't have to be. daily.dev is the homepage every developer deserves. A personalized developer news feed, dev communities, and search. Free, and open source. Much better than what's out there. Maybe ;) [Product Docs][product docs link] · [Changelog][changelog link] · [Report a Bug][report bug link] · [Request a Feature][github discussions link] · [Swag Store][swag store link] · [Brand Assets][brand book link] [![][chrome users shield]][chrome users link] [![][chrome rating shield]][chrome users link] [![][latest version…
read the full daily overview →
About Library-Detector-for-Chrome
Library Detector For Chrome =========================== The Library Detector extension discovers which JavaScript libraries are being utilized on webpages that you visit and displays their icons on the Chrome Menu. Currently supports: $mol view AmCharts AMP AmplifyJS Angular AngularJS ApexCharts Backbone base2 Bento boomerang.js Bootstrap Boq Brewser CamanJS Can Chart.js Chartist Closure Library ControlJS core js Create React App CreateJS D3 DC.js Dojo Drupal ECharts Ember.js Ext JS Ezoic Fabric.js FastClick FlexSlider FlotCharts Framer FuseJS FusionCharts Gatsby Glow Google Maps gRaphaël GreenSock JS…
read the full Library-Detector-for-Chrome overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is daily or Library-Detector-for-Chrome more popular?
daily has 20,111 GitHub stars and Library-Detector-for-Chrome has 680. daily has the larger community by that measure.
Are daily and Library-Detector-for-Chrome free?
Both are open source. daily is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Library-Detector-for-Chrome under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between daily and Library-Detector-for-Chrome?
daily is written in JavaScript and Library-Detector-for-Chrome in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, daily or Library-Detector-for-Chrome?
Choose daily if you want the larger community (20,111 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Library-Detector-for-Chrome if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.