head to head · open source
Osintgram vs cve
Osintgram has 14,628 GitHub stars, 3,127 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. cve has 8,087 stars, 977 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Osintgram leads on adoption by 81% (14,628 vs 8,087 stars). Osintgram is written in Python under GPL-3.0; cve is written in HTML under MIT. Osintgram has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, cve 12%. cve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (hacking, penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Osintgram | cve | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 15K | ★ 8.1K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 977 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Osintgram if
- You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cve if
- You want the cve feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and cve fits your workflow better
About Osintgram
Osintgram is a GPL 3.0 licensed OSINT tool for Instagram, written in Python 3.10+, that gives security researchers, penetration testers and investigators an interactive interface for profiling any public Instagram account from its nickname alone.
read the full Osintgram overview →
About cve
cve is an automatically generated, MIT licensed repository from Trickest that gathers almost every publicly available CVE Proof of Concept and publishes it as browsable markdown files, made for penetration testers, red teams and vulnerability researchers who need to find public exploits for a given identifier.
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Osintgram or cve more popular?
Osintgram has 14,628 GitHub stars and cve has 8,087. Osintgram has the larger community by that measure.
Are Osintgram and cve free?
Both are open source. Osintgram is licensed under GPL-3.0 and cve under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Osintgram and cve?
Osintgram is written in Python and cve in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Osintgram or cve?
Choose Osintgram if you want the larger community (14,628 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose cve if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.