head to head · open source

cubefs vs storage

cubefs has 5,667 GitHub stars, 715 forks, 265 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. storage has 1,327 stars, 308 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cubefs leads on adoption by 327% (5,667 vs 1,327 stars). cubefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; storage is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. cubefs has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, storage 23%. storage was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cubefs ★ 5.7K storage ★ 1.3K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cubefs storage
GitHub stars ★ 5.7K ★ 1.3K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 715 ⑂ 308
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cubefs if

  • You weight community size — 5.7K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cubefs profile →

pick storage if

  • You want the storage feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and storage fits your workflow better

full storage profile →

About cubefs

CubeFS is an Apache 2.0, CNCF graduated cloud native distributed file and object storage system written in Go, built for teams that need POSIX, HDFS, S3, and REST access to a single storage layer across datacenters, private and hybrid clouds, and Kubernetes.

read the full cubefs overview →

About storage

Supabase Storage is a lightweight, S3 compatible object storage service written in TypeScript that keeps its metadata in Postgres, and it is built for teams that want object storage whose access rules are expressed as database policies rather than as a separate permission layer.

read the full storage overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 84K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

cubefs vs ClickHouse cubefs vs seaweedfs cubefs vs rustfs cubefs vs parse-server cubefs vs Apache Pinot cubefs vs dlt cubefs vs mountpoint-s3 cubefs vs lakeFS cubefs vs ZeroFS cubefs vs versitygw cubefs vs cloudserver cubefs vs aistore

Frequently asked questions

Is cubefs or storage more popular?

cubefs has 5,667 GitHub stars and storage has 1,327. cubefs has the larger community by that measure.

Are cubefs and storage free?

Both are open source. cubefs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and storage under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cubefs and storage?

cubefs is written in Go and storage in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cubefs or storage?

Choose cubefs if you want the larger community (5,667 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose storage if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.