head to head · open source
cubefs vs storage
cubefs has 5,692 GitHub stars, 715 forks, 265 open issues and last shipped yesterday. storage has 1,354 stars, 319 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cubefs leads on adoption by 320% (5,692 vs 1,354 stars). cubefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; storage is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. cubefs has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, storage 24%. storage was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| cubefs | storage | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.7K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-11 | 2026-11-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 715 | ⑂ 319 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick cubefs if
- You weight community size — 5.7K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick storage if
- You want the storage feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and storage fits your workflow better
About cubefs
CubeFS Overview CubeFS ("储宝" in Chinese) is an open source cloud native distributed file & object storage system, hosted by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) as a graduated project. What can you build with CubeFS As an open source distributed storage, CubeFS can serve as your datacenter filesystem, data lake storage infra, and private or hybrid cloud storage. Moreover, it can be run in public cloud services, providing cache acceleration and file system semantics on top of public cloud storage such as S3. In particular, CubeFS enables the separation of storage/compute architecture for databases, search…
read the full cubefs overview →
About storage
Supabase Storage Engine A scalable, lightweight object storage service. Read this post on why we decided to build a new object storage service. Multi protocol support (HTTP, TUS, S3, Iceberg) Uses Postgres as its datastore for storing metadata Authorization rules are written as Postgres Row Level Security policies Integrates with S3 Compatible Storages Extremely lightweight and performant Supported Protocols [x] HTTP/REST [x] TUS Resumable Upload [x] S3 Compatible API [x] Iceberg REST Catalog Documentation OpenAPI Spec Storage Guides Client library Development Copy .env.sample to .env file. Copy .env.test.sample…
read the full storage overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Warehousing & Processing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is cubefs or storage more popular?
cubefs has 5,692 GitHub stars and storage has 1,354. cubefs has the larger community by that measure.
Are cubefs and storage free?
Both are open source. cubefs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and storage under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between cubefs and storage?
cubefs is written in Go and storage in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, cubefs or storage?
Choose cubefs if you want the larger community (5,692 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose storage if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.