head to head · open source

crowdsec vs dockle

crowdsec has 15,510 GitHub stars, 757 forks, 296 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. dockle has 3,296 stars, 171 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. crowdsec leads on adoption by 371% (15,510 vs 3,296 stars). crowdsec is written in Go under MIT; dockle is written in Go under Apache-2.0. crowdsec has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, dockle 5%. crowdsec was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (docker, kubernetes), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

crowdsec ★ 16K dockle ★ 3.3K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

crowdsec dockle
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 3.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-11-06 2026-08-10
Forks ⑂ 757 ⑂ 171
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick crowdsec if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full crowdsec profile →

pick dockle if

  • You want the dockle feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and dockle fits your workflow better

full dockle profile →

About crowdsec

CrowdSec: open source IDS/IPS, WAF and bot detection CrowdSec is an open source and participative security solution offering crowdsourced server detection and protection against malicious IPs. Detect and block with our Security Engine, contribute to the network, and enjoy our real time community blocklist. Features & Advantages Versatile Security Engine CrowdSec Security Engine is an all in one IDS/IPS and WAF. It detects bad behaviors by analyzing log sources and HTTP requests, and allows active remediation thanks to the Remediation Components. Detection rules are available on our hub under MIT license…

read the full crowdsec overview →

About dockle

Dockle Container Image Linter for Security, Helping build the Best Practice Docker Image, Easy to start Dockle helps you: 1. Build Best Practice Docker images 2. Build secure Docker images Checkpoints includes CIS Benchmarks See Installation and Common Examples Checkpoints Comparison TOC Features Comparison Installation Homebrew (Mac OS X / Linux and WSL) RHEL/CentOS Debian/Ubuntu Arch Linux Windows Microsoft PowerShell 7 Binary asdf mise From source Use Docker Quick Start Basic Docker Checkpoint Summary Common Examples Scan an image Scan an image file Get or Save the results as JSON Get or Save the results as…

read the full dockle overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Related comparisons

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

Frequently asked questions

Is crowdsec or dockle more popular?

crowdsec has 15,510 GitHub stars and dockle has 3,296. crowdsec has the larger community by that measure.

Are crowdsec and dockle free?

Both are open source. crowdsec is licensed under MIT and dockle under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between crowdsec and dockle?

crowdsec is written in Go and dockle in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, crowdsec or dockle?

Choose crowdsec if you want the larger community (15,510 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dockle if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.