head to head · open source

cve vs crlfuzz

cve has 8,087 GitHub stars, 977 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. crlfuzz has 1,565 stars, 146 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. cve leads on adoption by 417% (8,087 vs 1,565 stars). cve is written in HTML under MIT; crlfuzz is written in Go under MIT. cve has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, crlfuzz 9%. cve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cve ★ 8.1K crlfuzz ★ 1.6K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cve crlfuzz
GitHub stars ★ 8.1K ★ 1.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in HTML Go
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-08-28
Forks ⑂ 977 ⑂ 146
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cve if

  • You weight community size — 8.1K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cve profile →

pick crlfuzz if

  • You want the crlfuzz feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and crlfuzz fits your workflow better

full crlfuzz profile →

About cve

cve is an automatically generated, MIT licensed repository from Trickest that gathers almost every publicly available CVE Proof of Concept and publishes it as browsable markdown files, made for penetration testers, red teams and vulnerability researchers who need to find public exploits for a given identifier.

read the full cve overview →

About crlfuzz

CRLFuzz is a fast, MIT licensed command line tool written in Go that scans web targets for CRLF injection vulnerabilities, aimed at penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, and security engineers who need to check either a single URL or a long list of them quickly.

read the full crlfuzz overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

cve vs PayloadsAllTheThings cve vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills cve vs ProjectDiscovery cve vs pentagi cve vs PentestGPT cve vs Osintgram cve vs thc-hydra cve vs vuls cve vs osv-scanner cve vs rengine cve vs reconftw cve vs Nettacker

Frequently asked questions

Is cve or crlfuzz more popular?

cve has 8,087 GitHub stars and crlfuzz has 1,565. cve has the larger community by that measure.

Are cve and crlfuzz free?

Both are open source. cve is licensed under MIT and crlfuzz under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cve and crlfuzz?

cve is written in HTML and crlfuzz in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cve or crlfuzz?

Choose cve if you want the larger community (8,087 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose crlfuzz if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.