head to head · open source

core vs koala

core has 8,829 GitHub stars, 2,059 forks, 141 open issues and last shipped yesterday. koala has 3,568 stars, 456 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. core leads on adoption by 147% (8,829 vs 3,568 stars). core is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0; koala is written in Ruby under MIT. core has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, koala 13%. core was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

core ★ 8.8K koala ★ 3.6K category Community & Social

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

core koala
GitHub stars ★ 8.8K ★ 3.6K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in PHP Ruby
Last push 2026-09-19 2025-10-16
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 456
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick core if

  • You weight community size — 8.8K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full core profile →

pick koala if

  • You want the koala feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and koala fits your workflow better

full koala profile →

About core

ownCloud Core is the server side component of ownCloud Classic, an open source file platform written in PHP and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It provides file storage, synchronization, and sharing, and it ships WebDAV, CalDAV, and CardDAV servers alongside a plugin architecture that other ownCloud apps extend. The repository is the main one for ownCloud Classic and serves as the foundation for apps such as Activity, Calendar, and Contacts. Development is stewarded by the Kiteworks Open Source Program Office under the ownCloud brand.

read the full core overview →

About koala

Koala is a lightweight Ruby library for Facebook APIs. It supports the Graph API, the Marketing API, the Atlas API, realtime updates, test users, and OAuth validation. It lives in the Ruby and Ruby on Rails ecosystem and provides API accessors that return simple JSON responses.

read the full koala overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Bluesky ★ 18K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K

Related comparisons

mastodon vs core mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review

More Social Networking projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Social Networking field.

core vs Mastodon core vs maigret core vs glance core vs Bluesky core vs Lemmy core vs owncast core vs misskey core vs Pixelfed core vs Infinity-For-Reddit core vs writefreely core vs Reddit-Enhancement-Suite core vs praw

Frequently asked questions

Is core or koala more popular?

core has 8,829 GitHub stars and koala has 3,568. core has the larger community by that measure.

Are core and koala free?

Both are open source. core is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and koala under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between core and koala?

core is written in PHP and koala in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, core or koala?

Choose core if you want the larger community (8,829 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose koala if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.