head to head · open source
codex-security vs ship-safe
codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars, 903 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ship-safe has 870 stars, 115 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. codex-security leads on adoption by 1,197% (11,287 vs 870 stars). codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; ship-safe is written in JavaScript under MIT. codex-security has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, ship-safe 13%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (ai-security, cli, devsecops, npm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codex-security | ship-safe | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 870 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 903 | ⑂ 115 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codex-security if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ship-safe if
- You want the ship-safe feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and ship-safe fits your workflow better
About codex-security
Codex Security @openai/codex security is a CLI and TypeScript SDK for defining security policy and finding, validating, and fixing security vulnerabilities in your code. 👉👉 See the Codex Security documentation for full documentation. Some cybersecurity requests and protected findings require approval through Trusted Access for Cyber. To join the program, visit chatgpt.com/cyber. Quick start Requires Node.js 22.13.0 or later and Python 3.10 or later. For CI, set OPENAI API KEY instead of signing in. Generate SECURITY.md Draft repository wide or component scoped SECURITY.md guidance for future scans: The command…
read the full codex-security overview →
About ship-safe
The independent security agent for AI written software. It finds issues, investigates whether they are real, and shows you the evidence. Website · Docs · Security & Data Flow · Benchmark · Pricing · Blog · Contribute Ship Safe CLI Ship Safe runs locally in your repo and works in two layers. A deterministic engine finds issues across application code, AI agents, MCP configs, prompts, dependencies, CI/CD, secrets, and cloud adjacent configuration. Fast, repeatable, and benchmarked — this is the sensor layer. An investigation layer then decides what the findings are worth. It traces the value that reaches a sink…
read the full ship-safe overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codex-security or ship-safe more popular?
codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars and ship-safe has 870. codex-security has the larger community by that measure.
Are codex-security and ship-safe free?
Both are open source. codex-security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ship-safe under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between codex-security and ship-safe?
codex-security is written in TypeScript and ship-safe in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codex-security or ship-safe?
Choose codex-security if you want the larger community (11,287 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ship-safe if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.