head to head · open source

CodeEdit vs zasper

CodeEdit has 23,060 GitHub stars, 1,192 forks, 213 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. zasper has 2,354 stars, 79 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. CodeEdit leads on adoption by 880% (23,060 vs 2,354 stars). CodeEdit is written in Swift under MIT; zasper is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. CodeEdit has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, zasper 3%. zasper was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ide), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CodeEdit ★ 23K zasper ★ 2.4K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CodeEdit zasper
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 2.4K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Swift TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-18 2026-10-02
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 79
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CodeEdit if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CodeEdit profile →

pick zasper if

  • You want the zasper feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and zasper fits your workflow better

full zasper profile →

About CodeEdit

CodeEdit is a code editor for macOS. It is written in Swift, released under the MIT license, and described as a community project. The GitHub description says the app is open source and free forever. The project aims to provide a native editing experience for developers who work on software outside Apple platform projects.

read the full CodeEdit overview →

About zasper

Zasper is a high performance, self hosted IDE for Jupyter notebooks that runs any Jupyter kernel from a single static binary, aimed at data scientists and teams who want JupyterLab's workflow without its resource footprint.

read the full zasper overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 275K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K

Related comparisons

react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

CodeEdit vs vscode CodeEdit vs Neovim CodeEdit vs Zed CodeEdit vs code-server CodeEdit vs helix CodeEdit vs vscodium CodeEdit vs NvChad CodeEdit vs Kilo CodeEdit vs opcode CodeEdit vs devpod CodeEdit vs platformio-core CodeEdit vs spyder

Frequently asked questions

Is CodeEdit or zasper more popular?

CodeEdit has 23,060 GitHub stars and zasper has 2,354. CodeEdit has the larger community by that measure.

Are CodeEdit and zasper free?

Both are open source. CodeEdit is licensed under MIT and zasper under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CodeEdit and zasper?

CodeEdit is written in Swift and zasper in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CodeEdit or zasper?

Choose CodeEdit if you want the larger community (23,060 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zasper if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.