head to head · open source

CodeEdit vs metals

CodeEdit has 23,062 GitHub stars, 1,192 forks, 213 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. metals has 2,333 stars, 445 forks, 282 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CodeEdit leads on adoption by 889% (23,062 vs 2,333 stars). CodeEdit is written in Swift under MIT; metals is written in Scala under Apache-2.0. CodeEdit has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, metals 19%. metals was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ide), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CodeEdit ★ 23K metals ★ 2.3K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CodeEdit metals
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 2.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Swift Scala
Last push 2026-08-18 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 445
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CodeEdit if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CodeEdit profile →

pick metals if

  • You want the metals feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Scala
  • You evaluated both and metals fits your workflow better

full metals profile →

About CodeEdit

CodeEdit is a code editor for macOS. It is written in Swift, released under the MIT license, and described as a community project. The GitHub description says the app is open source and free forever. The project aims to provide a native editing experience for developers who work on software outside Apple platform projects.

read the full CodeEdit overview →

About metals

Metals is a Scala language server that brings rich IDE features to editors supporting the Language Server Protocol, aimed at Scala developers who want full tooling outside of IntelliJ IDEA.

read the full metals overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 275K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

CodeEdit vs vscode CodeEdit vs Neovim CodeEdit vs Zed CodeEdit vs code-server CodeEdit vs helix CodeEdit vs vscodium CodeEdit vs NvChad CodeEdit vs Kilo CodeEdit vs opcode CodeEdit vs devpod CodeEdit vs platformio-core CodeEdit vs spyder

Frequently asked questions

Is CodeEdit or metals more popular?

CodeEdit has 23,062 GitHub stars and metals has 2,333. CodeEdit has the larger community by that measure.

Are CodeEdit and metals free?

Both are open source. CodeEdit is licensed under MIT and metals under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CodeEdit and metals?

CodeEdit is written in Swift and metals in Scala. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CodeEdit or metals?

Choose CodeEdit if you want the larger community (23,062 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose metals if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.