head to head · open source

CodeEdit vs ecode

CodeEdit has 23,039 GitHub stars, 1,189 forks, 213 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. ecode has 1,680 stars, 29 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. CodeEdit leads on adoption by 1,271% (23,039 vs 1,680 stars). CodeEdit is written in Swift under MIT; ecode is written in Lua under MIT. CodeEdit has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, ecode 2%. ecode was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (code, code-editor, editor, ide), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CodeEdit ★ 23K ecode ★ 1.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CodeEdit ecode
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 1.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in Swift Lua
Last push 2026-08-18 2026-09-06
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 29
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CodeEdit if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CodeEdit profile →

pick ecode if

  • You want the ecode feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You evaluated both and ecode fits your workflow better

full ecode profile →

About CodeEdit

CodeEdit is a code editor for macOS. It is written in Swift, released under the MIT license, and described as a community project. The GitHub description says the app is open source and free forever. The project aims to provide a native editing experience for developers who work on software outside Apple platform projects.

read the full CodeEdit overview →

About ecode

ecode is a lightweight, multi platform code editor built on the hardware accelerated eepp GUI for developers who want responsiveness and performance on modern hardware, released under the MIT licence.

read the full ecode overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 265K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

CodeEdit vs vscode CodeEdit vs Neovim CodeEdit vs Zed CodeEdit vs code-server CodeEdit vs helix CodeEdit vs vscodium CodeEdit vs NvChad CodeEdit vs Kilo CodeEdit vs opcode CodeEdit vs devpod CodeEdit vs platformio-core CodeEdit vs spyder

Frequently asked questions

Is CodeEdit or ecode more popular?

CodeEdit has 23,039 GitHub stars and ecode has 1,680. CodeEdit has the larger community by that measure.

Are CodeEdit and ecode free?

Both are open source. CodeEdit is licensed under MIT and ecode under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CodeEdit and ecode?

CodeEdit is written in Swift and ecode in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CodeEdit or ecode?

Choose CodeEdit if you want the larger community (23,039 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ecode if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.