head to head · open source

CodeEdit vs dillinger

CodeEdit has 23,040 GitHub stars, 1,189 forks, 213 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. dillinger has 8,286 stars, 1,156 forks, 157 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. CodeEdit leads on adoption by 178% (23,040 vs 8,286 stars). CodeEdit is written in Swift under MIT; dillinger is written in TypeScript under MIT. CodeEdit has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, dillinger 14%. CodeEdit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (editor, ide), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CodeEdit ★ 23K dillinger ★ 8.3K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CodeEdit dillinger
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 8.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in Swift TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-18 2026-06-21
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CodeEdit if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CodeEdit profile →

pick dillinger if

  • You want the dillinger feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and dillinger fits your workflow better

full dillinger profile →

About CodeEdit

CodeEdit is a code editor for macOS. It is written in Swift, released under the MIT license, and described as a community project. The GitHub description says the app is open source and free forever. The project aims to provide a native editing experience for developers who work on software outside Apple platform projects.

read the full CodeEdit overview →

About dillinger

Dillinger is a free, MIT licensed, cloud native Markdown editor built on Next.js and the Monaco Editor, intended for developers, bloggers and writers who want focused writing in the browser with the option to sync finished documents to cloud storage they already use.

read the full dillinger overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 266K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 210K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

CodeEdit vs vscode CodeEdit vs Neovim CodeEdit vs Zed CodeEdit vs code-server CodeEdit vs helix CodeEdit vs vscodium CodeEdit vs NvChad CodeEdit vs Kilo CodeEdit vs opcode CodeEdit vs devpod CodeEdit vs platformio-core CodeEdit vs spyder

Frequently asked questions

Is CodeEdit or dillinger more popular?

CodeEdit has 23,040 GitHub stars and dillinger has 8,286. CodeEdit has the larger community by that measure.

Are CodeEdit and dillinger free?

Both are open source. CodeEdit is licensed under MIT and dillinger under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CodeEdit and dillinger?

CodeEdit is written in Swift and dillinger in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CodeEdit or dillinger?

Choose CodeEdit if you want the larger community (23,040 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dillinger if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.