head to head · open source
CodeEdit vs auto-dev
CodeEdit has 23,121 GitHub stars, 1,196 forks, 213 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. auto-dev has 4,567 stars, 501 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. CodeEdit leads on adoption by 406% (23,121 vs 4,567 stars). CodeEdit is written in Swift under MIT; auto-dev is written in Kotlin under MPL-2.0. CodeEdit has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, auto-dev 11%. CodeEdit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ide), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CodeEdit | auto-dev | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 4.6K |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Written in | Swift | Kotlin |
| Last push | 2026-10-17 | 2026-09-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 501 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CodeEdit if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Swift
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick auto-dev if
- You want the auto-dev feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Kotlin
- You evaluated both and auto-dev fits your workflow better
About CodeEdit
CodeEdit for macOS CodeEdit is a code editor built by the community, for the community, written entirely and unapologetically for macOS. Features include syntax highlighting, code completion, project find and replace, snippets, terminal, task running, debugging, git integration, code review, extensions, and more. [!IMPORTANT] CodeEdit is currently in development and not yet recommended for production use, however you can take part in shaping it's future by test driving pre release versions and submitting an issue to let us know what you think. Table of Contents Motivation Mission Community Activity Contributing…
read the full CodeEdit overview →
About auto-dev
AutoDev 3.0 Xiuper (Alpha) One Platform. All Phases. Every Device. 统一平台 · 全开发阶段 · 跨全设备 AutoDev Xiuper is an AI native, multi agent development platform built on Kotlin Multiplatform. Based on the current codebase, it focuses on document research, coding, code review, data query, artifact generation, and web interaction workflows, and targets IntelliJ IDEA, VS Code, CLI, Desktop JVM, Android, iOS, JS/WASM Web, and Server runtimes. One Platform Architecture Get Started Download AutoDev Xiuper IntelliJ IDEA Plugin : JetBrains Marketplace VSCode Extension : Visual Studio Marketplace CLI Tool : npm install g…
read the full auto-dev overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More IDEs & Code Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CodeEdit or auto-dev more popular?
CodeEdit has 23,121 GitHub stars and auto-dev has 4,567. CodeEdit has the larger community by that measure.
Are CodeEdit and auto-dev free?
Both are open source. CodeEdit is licensed under MIT and auto-dev under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CodeEdit and auto-dev?
CodeEdit is written in Swift and auto-dev in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CodeEdit or auto-dev?
Choose CodeEdit if you want the larger community (23,121 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose auto-dev if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.