head to head · open source

CodeEdit vs auto-dev

CodeEdit has 23,053 GitHub stars, 1,193 forks, 213 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. auto-dev has 4,548 stars, 502 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. CodeEdit leads on adoption by 407% (23,053 vs 4,548 stars). CodeEdit is written in Swift under MIT; auto-dev is written in Kotlin under MPL-2.0. CodeEdit has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, auto-dev 11%. auto-dev was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ide), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CodeEdit ★ 23K auto-dev ★ 4.5K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CodeEdit auto-dev
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 4.5K
License MIT MPL-2.0
Written in Swift Kotlin
Last push 2026-08-18 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 502
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CodeEdit if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CodeEdit profile →

pick auto-dev if

  • You want the auto-dev feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and auto-dev fits your workflow better

full auto-dev profile →

About CodeEdit

CodeEdit is a code editor for macOS. It is written in Swift, released under the MIT license, and described as a community project. The GitHub description says the app is open source and free forever. The project aims to provide a native editing experience for developers who work on software outside Apple platform projects.

read the full CodeEdit overview →

About auto-dev

AutoDev is an AI native, multi agent development platform built on Kotlin Multiplatform that lets developers run coding, review, and document workflows from IntelliJ IDEA, VS Code, the CLI, desktop, mobile, or the web.

read the full auto-dev overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 270K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 211K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

CodeEdit vs vscode CodeEdit vs Neovim CodeEdit vs Zed CodeEdit vs code-server CodeEdit vs helix CodeEdit vs vscodium CodeEdit vs NvChad CodeEdit vs Kilo CodeEdit vs opcode CodeEdit vs devpod CodeEdit vs platformio-core CodeEdit vs spyder

Frequently asked questions

Is CodeEdit or auto-dev more popular?

CodeEdit has 23,053 GitHub stars and auto-dev has 4,548. CodeEdit has the larger community by that measure.

Are CodeEdit and auto-dev free?

Both are open source. CodeEdit is licensed under MIT and auto-dev under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CodeEdit and auto-dev?

CodeEdit is written in Swift and auto-dev in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CodeEdit or auto-dev?

Choose CodeEdit if you want the larger community (23,053 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose auto-dev if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.