head to head · open source

cobalt vs Kittysploit-framework

cobalt has 45,722 GitHub stars, 4,031 forks, 269 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. Kittysploit-framework has 631 stars, 100 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cobalt leads on adoption by 7,146% (45,722 vs 631 stars). cobalt is written in Svelte under AGPL-3.0; Kittysploit-framework is written in Python under MIT. cobalt has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Kittysploit-framework 16%. Kittysploit-framework was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cobalt ★ 46K Kittysploit-framework ★ 631 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cobalt Kittysploit-framework
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 631
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Svelte Python
Last push 2026-04-06 2026-11-01
Forks ⑂ 4.0K ⑂ 100
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cobalt if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Svelte
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cobalt profile →

pick Kittysploit-framework if

  • You want the Kittysploit-framework feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Kittysploit-framework fits your workflow better

full Kittysploit-framework profile →

About cobalt

best way to save what you love cobalt.tools 💬 community discord server 🐦 twitter 🦋 bluesky cobalt is a media downloader that doesn't piss you off. it's friendly, efficient, and doesn't have ads, trackers, paywalls or other nonsense. paste the link, get the file, move on. that simple, just how it should be. cobalt monorepo this monorepo includes source code for api, frontend, and related packages: api tree & readme web tree & readme packages tree it also includes documentation in the docs tree: how to run a cobalt instance how to protect a cobalt instance cobalt api instance environment variables cobalt api…

read the full cobalt overview →

About Kittysploit-framework

KittySploit From recon to shell — in one console. Autonomous agent for web/API testing. 8,000+ modules. Built in C2. Local LLM. Scope aware. Automation ready. Quick start · Docs · Website · Discord Why KittySploit? Most stacks force you to jump between a scanner, an exploit framework, a C2, a proxy, and a notebook. KittySploit keeps the engagement in one place — modules, sessions, scope, and an autonomous agent that plans and executes against authorized targets. Quick Start Linux and macOS One line installer: Windows First 60 seconds Use plan only / dry run until you are ready for live actions. Always test…

read the full Kittysploit-framework overview →

More in Business Software

Related comparisons

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Frequently asked questions

Is cobalt or Kittysploit-framework more popular?

cobalt has 45,722 GitHub stars and Kittysploit-framework has 631. cobalt has the larger community by that measure.

Are cobalt and Kittysploit-framework free?

Both are open source. cobalt is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Kittysploit-framework under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cobalt and Kittysploit-framework?

cobalt is written in Svelte and Kittysploit-framework in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cobalt or Kittysploit-framework?

Choose cobalt if you want the larger community (45,722 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Kittysploit-framework if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.