head to head · open source

ClickHouse vs bigquery-utils

ClickHouse has 49,959 GitHub stars, 8,971 forks, 7,547 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bigquery-utils has 1,312 stars, 337 forks, 64 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. ClickHouse leads on adoption by 3,708% (49,959 vs 1,312 stars). ClickHouse is written in C++ under Apache-2.0; bigquery-utils is written in Jupyter Notebook under Apache-2.0. ClickHouse has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, bigquery-utils 26%. ClickHouse was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ClickHouse ★ 50K bigquery-utils ★ 1.3K category Data & Analytics

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ClickHouse bigquery-utils
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 1.3K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in C++ Jupyter Notebook
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-07-03
Forks ⑂ 9.0K ⑂ 337
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ClickHouse if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ClickHouse profile →

pick bigquery-utils if

  • You want the bigquery-utils feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Jupyter Notebook
  • You evaluated both and bigquery-utils fits your workflow better

full bigquery-utils profile →

About ClickHouse

ClickHouse is an open source, column oriented database management system written in C++ that delivers real time analytical query performance on massive datasets. It operates within the broader data infrastructure ecosystem, serving as a high performance alternative to traditional row oriented databases for OLAP workloads.

read the full ClickHouse overview →

About bigquery-utils

Useful scripts, UDFs, views, notebooks, dashboards, and other utilities for migrating to and operating a data warehouse in Google BigQuery, aimed at data engineers, analytics engineers, and migration teams working on Google Cloud Platform.

read the full bigquery-utils overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse clickhouse vs duckdb mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

ClickHouse vs seaweedfs ClickHouse vs rustfs ClickHouse vs parse-server ClickHouse vs Apache Pinot ClickHouse vs dlt ClickHouse vs hue ClickHouse vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is ClickHouse or bigquery-utils more popular?

ClickHouse has 49,959 GitHub stars and bigquery-utils has 1,312. ClickHouse has the larger community by that measure.

Are ClickHouse and bigquery-utils free?

Both are open source. ClickHouse is licensed under Apache-2.0 and bigquery-utils under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ClickHouse and bigquery-utils?

ClickHouse is written in C++ and bigquery-utils in Jupyter Notebook. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ClickHouse or bigquery-utils?

Choose ClickHouse if you want the larger community (49,959 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose bigquery-utils if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.