head to head · open source

ClickHouse vs seaweedfs

ClickHouse has 49,959 GitHub stars, 8,971 forks, 7,547 open issues and last shipped yesterday. seaweedfs has 34,819 stars, 3,002 forks, 772 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ClickHouse leads on adoption by 43% (49,959 vs 34,819 stars). ClickHouse is written in C++ under Apache-2.0; seaweedfs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. ClickHouse has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, seaweedfs 9%. seaweedfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ClickHouse ★ 50K seaweedfs ★ 35K category Data & Analytics

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ClickHouse seaweedfs
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 35K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in C++ Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 9.0K ⑂ 3.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ClickHouse if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ClickHouse profile →

pick seaweedfs if

  • You want the seaweedfs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and seaweedfs fits your workflow better

full seaweedfs profile →

About ClickHouse

ClickHouse is an open source, column oriented database management system written in C++ that delivers real time analytical query performance on massive datasets. It operates within the broader data infrastructure ecosystem, serving as a high performance alternative to traditional row oriented databases for OLAP workloads.

read the full ClickHouse overview →

About seaweedfs

SeaweedFS is an Apache 2.0 distributed storage system written in Go that serves an S3 compatible object store, a POSIX file system, and Iceberg lakehouse tables from one weed binary, built for storing and serving billions of files with O(1) disk access.

read the full seaweedfs overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse clickhouse vs duckdb mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

ClickHouse vs rustfs ClickHouse vs parse-server ClickHouse vs Apache Pinot ClickHouse vs dlt ClickHouse vs hue ClickHouse vs bigquery-utils ClickHouse vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is ClickHouse or seaweedfs more popular?

ClickHouse has 49,959 GitHub stars and seaweedfs has 34,819. ClickHouse has the larger community by that measure.

Are ClickHouse and seaweedfs free?

Both are open source. ClickHouse is licensed under Apache-2.0 and seaweedfs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ClickHouse and seaweedfs?

ClickHouse is written in C++ and seaweedfs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ClickHouse or seaweedfs?

Choose ClickHouse if you want the larger community (49,959 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose seaweedfs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.