head to head · open source

ClickHouse vs Apache Pinot

ClickHouse has 49,951 GitHub stars, 8,969 forks, 7,547 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Apache Pinot has 6,138 stars, 1,509 forks, 1,403 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ClickHouse leads on adoption by 714% (49,951 vs 6,138 stars). ClickHouse is written in C++ under Apache-2.0; Apache Pinot is written in Java under Apache-2.0. ClickHouse has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, Apache Pinot 25%. ClickHouse was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ClickHouse ★ 50K Apache Pinot ★ 6.1K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

ClickHouse Apache Pinot
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 6.1K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in C++ Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 9.0K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ClickHouse if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ClickHouse profile →

pick Apache Pinot if

  • You want the Apache Pinot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Apache Pinot fits your workflow better

full Apache Pinot profile →

About ClickHouse

ClickHouse is an open source, column oriented database management system written in C++ that delivers real time analytical query performance on massive datasets. It operates within the broader data infrastructure ecosystem, serving as a high performance alternative to traditional row oriented databases for OLAP workloads.

read the full ClickHouse overview →

About Apache Pinot

Apache Pinot is a real time distributed OLAP datastore built to deliver scalable real time analytics at low latency. It lives in the Java ecosystem, is licensed under Apache 2.0, and was originally built by engineers at LinkedIn and Uber. The project ingests from batch data sources such as Hadoop HDFS, Amazon S3, Azure ADLS, and Google Cloud Storage, as well as from stream data sources such as Apache Kafka. It is designed to scale up and out with no upper bound, and its performance stays constant based on the size of the cluster and an expected query per second threshold.

read the full Apache Pinot overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs

Frequently asked questions

Is ClickHouse or Apache Pinot more popular?

ClickHouse has 49,951 GitHub stars and Apache Pinot has 6,138. ClickHouse has the larger community by that measure.

Are ClickHouse and Apache Pinot free?

Both are open source. ClickHouse is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Apache Pinot under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ClickHouse and Apache Pinot?

ClickHouse is written in C++ and Apache Pinot in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ClickHouse or Apache Pinot?

Choose ClickHouse if you want the larger community (49,951 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Apache Pinot if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.