head to head · open source
openapi-generator vs cli-printing-press
openapi-generator has 26,848 GitHub stars, 7,751 forks, 5,820 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cli-printing-press has 4,909 stars, 534 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. openapi-generator leads on adoption by 447% (26,848 vs 4,909 stars). openapi-generator is written in Java under Apache-2.0; cli-printing-press is written in Go under MIT. openapi-generator has attracted 29% as many forks as stars, cli-printing-press 11%. cli-printing-press was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (openapi), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| openapi-generator | cli-printing-press | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 4.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.8K | ⑂ 534 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick openapi-generator if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cli-printing-press if
- You want the cli-printing-press feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and cli-printing-press fits your workflow better
About openapi-generator
OpenAPI Generator Master ( 7.28.0 ): :star::star::star: If you would like to contribute, please refer to guidelines and a list of open tasks. :star::star::star: :bangbang: To migrate from Swagger Codegen to OpenAPI Generator, please refer to the migration guide :bangbang: :notebook with decorative cover: For more information, please refer to the Wiki page and FAQ :notebook with decorative cover: :notebook with decorative cover: The eBook A Beginner's Guide to Code Generation for REST APIs is a good starting point for beginners :notebook with decorative cover: :warning: If the OpenAPI spec, templates or any input…
read the full openapi-generator overview →
About cli-printing-press
CLI Printing Press Nothing is more valuable than time and money. In a world of AI agents, that's speed and token spend. A well designed CLI is muscle memory for an agent: no hunting through docs, no wrong turns, no wasted tokens. We built the Printing Press to print the best CLIs in the world for agents. It reads the official API docs, studies every popular community CLI and MCP server, sniffs the web for the APIs nobody published (think Google Flights or Dominos), and applies the power user playbook Peter Steinberger proved with discrawl and gogcli local SQLite, compound commands, agent native flags. It fuses…
read the full cli-printing-press overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is openapi-generator or cli-printing-press more popular?
openapi-generator has 26,848 GitHub stars and cli-printing-press has 4,909. openapi-generator has the larger community by that measure.
Are openapi-generator and cli-printing-press free?
Both are open source. openapi-generator is licensed under Apache-2.0 and cli-printing-press under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between openapi-generator and cli-printing-press?
openapi-generator is written in Java and cli-printing-press in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, openapi-generator or cli-printing-press?
Choose openapi-generator if you want the larger community (26,848 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose cli-printing-press if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.