head to head · open source

grpc-gateway vs cli-printing-press

grpc-gateway has 20,008 GitHub stars, 2,413 forks, 149 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cli-printing-press has 4,909 stars, 534 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. grpc-gateway leads on adoption by 308% (20,008 vs 4,909 stars). grpc-gateway is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause; cli-printing-press is written in Go under MIT. grpc-gateway has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, cli-printing-press 11%. grpc-gateway was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (openapi), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

grpc-gateway ★ 20K cli-printing-press ★ 4.9K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

grpc-gateway cli-printing-press
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 4.9K
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-11-03
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 534
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick grpc-gateway if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full grpc-gateway profile →

pick cli-printing-press if

  • You want the cli-printing-press feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and cli-printing-press fits your workflow better

full cli-printing-press profile →

About grpc-gateway

gRPC Gateway gRPC to JSON proxy generator following the gRPC HTTP spec About The gRPC Gateway is a plugin of the Google protocol buffers compiler protoc. It reads protobuf service definitions and generates a reverse proxy server which translates a RESTful HTTP API into gRPC. This server is generated according to the google.api.http annotations in your service definitions. This helps you provide your APIs in both gRPC and RESTful style at the same time. Docs You can read our docs at: Testimonials We use the gRPC Gateway to serve millions of API requests per day, and have been since 2018 and through all of that…

read the full grpc-gateway overview →

About cli-printing-press

CLI Printing Press Nothing is more valuable than time and money. In a world of AI agents, that's speed and token spend. A well designed CLI is muscle memory for an agent: no hunting through docs, no wrong turns, no wasted tokens. We built the Printing Press to print the best CLIs in the world for agents. It reads the official API docs, studies every popular community CLI and MCP server, sniffs the web for the APIs nobody published (think Google Flights or Dominos), and applies the power user playbook Peter Steinberger proved with discrawl and gogcli local SQLite, compound commands, agent native flags. It fuses…

read the full cli-printing-press overview →

More in Developer Tools

Related comparisons

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Frequently asked questions

Is grpc-gateway or cli-printing-press more popular?

grpc-gateway has 20,008 GitHub stars and cli-printing-press has 4,909. grpc-gateway has the larger community by that measure.

Are grpc-gateway and cli-printing-press free?

Both are open source. grpc-gateway is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and cli-printing-press under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between grpc-gateway and cli-printing-press?

grpc-gateway is written in Go and cli-printing-press in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, grpc-gateway or cli-printing-press?

Choose grpc-gateway if you want the larger community (20,008 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose cli-printing-press if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.