head to head · open source

claude-context vs MineContext

claude-context has 12,667 GitHub stars, 939 forks, 146 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. MineContext has 5,543 stars, 414 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. claude-context leads on adoption by 129% (12,667 vs 5,543 stars). claude-context is written in TypeScript under MIT; MineContext is written in Python under Apache-2.0. claude-context has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, MineContext 7%. claude-context was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (agent), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

claude-context ★ 13K MineContext ★ 5.5K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

claude-context MineContext
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 5.5K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-07-14 2026-05-07
Forks ⑂ 939 ⑂ 414
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick claude-context if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full claude-context profile →

pick MineContext if

  • You want the MineContext feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and MineContext fits your workflow better

full MineContext profile →

About claude-context

🆕 Looking for persistent memory for Claude Code? Check out memsearch Claude Code plugin — a markdown first memory system that gives your AI agent long term memory across sessions. Your entire codebase as Claude's context Claude Context is an MCP plugin that adds semantic code search to Claude Code and other AI coding agents, giving them deep context from your entire codebase. 🧠 Your Entire Codebase as Context : Claude Context uses semantic search to find all relevant code from millions of lines. No multi round discovery needed. It brings results straight into the Claude's context. 💰 Cost Effective for Large…

read the full claude-context overview →

About MineContext

MineContext: Create with Context, Clarity from Chaos An open source, proactive context aware AI partner, dedicated to bringing clarity and efficiency to your work, study and creation. 中文 / English Community Best Practice · Report Issues · Feedback [![][release shield]][release link] [![][github stars shield]][github stars link] [![][github issues shield]][github issues shield link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license shield link] [![][last commit shield]][last commit shield link] [![][wechat shield]][wechat shield link] 👋 Join our WeChat / Lark / Red Note…

read the full MineContext overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

Frequently asked questions

Is claude-context or MineContext more popular?

claude-context has 12,667 GitHub stars and MineContext has 5,543. claude-context has the larger community by that measure.

Are claude-context and MineContext free?

Both are open source. claude-context is licensed under MIT and MineContext under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between claude-context and MineContext?

claude-context is written in TypeScript and MineContext in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, claude-context or MineContext?

Choose claude-context if you want the larger community (12,667 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose MineContext if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.