head to head · open source
chromium vs archiveweb.page
chromium has 24,824 GitHub stars, 9,251 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. archiveweb.page has 1,577 stars, 112 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. chromium leads on adoption by 1,474% (24,824 vs 1,577 stars). chromium is written in various languages under BSD-3-Clause; archiveweb.page is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. chromium has attracted 37% as many forks as stars, archiveweb.page 7%. chromium was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chromium), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chromium | archiveweb.page | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | — | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.3K | ⑂ 112 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chromium if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick archiveweb.page if
- You want the archiveweb.page feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and archiveweb.page fits your workflow better
About chromium
The official GitHub mirror of the Chromium source — read only snapshot of the codebase behind the Chromium open source browser project, aimed at developers and packagers who need to read, build, or audit browser source rather than end users looking for a browser download.
read the full chromium overview →
About archiveweb.page
ArchiveWeb.page is a JavaScript web archiving application that runs directly in the browser as a Chrome/Chromium extension or a standalone Electron app, built for anyone who needs to capture, store, and replay high fidelity web archives without a server side capture pipeline.
read the full archiveweb.page overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chromium or archiveweb.page more popular?
chromium has 24,824 GitHub stars and archiveweb.page has 1,577. chromium has the larger community by that measure.
Are chromium and archiveweb.page free?
Both are open source. chromium is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and archiveweb.page under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chromium and archiveweb.page?
chromium is written in various languages and archiveweb.page in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chromium or archiveweb.page?
Choose chromium if you want the larger community (24,824 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose archiveweb.page if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.