head to head · open source
chitchatter vs jitsi-meet-electron
chitchatter has 2,344 GitHub stars, 455 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. jitsi-meet-electron has 1,636 stars, 513 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. chitchatter leads on adoption by 43% (2,344 vs 1,636 stars). chitchatter is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; jitsi-meet-electron is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. chitchatter has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, jitsi-meet-electron 31%. chitchatter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (video-conferencing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chitchatter | jitsi-meet-electron | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 2.3K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 455 | ⑂ 513 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chitchatter if
- You weight community size — 2.3K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick jitsi-meet-electron if
- You want the jitsi-meet-electron feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and jitsi-meet-electron fits your workflow better
About chitchatter
Chitchatter Logo provided by @ramyashreeshetty Chitchatter is a free (as in both price and freedom) communication tool. Designed to be the simplest way to connect with others privately and securely, it is: Fully open source (licensed under GPL v2) Peer to peer Whenever possible, otherwise a TURN server is used to ensure reliable peer connection End to end encrypted (via WebRTC) Ephemeral Message content is never persisted to disk on either the client or server Decentralized No API server required . Chitchatter works completely without an API server all that's required for basic functionality is availability of…
read the full chitchatter overview →
About jitsi-meet-electron
Jitsi Meet Electron Desktop application for [Jitsi Meet] built with [Electron]. Features End to End Encryption support (BETA) Works with any Jitsi Meet deployment Built in auto updates Screen sharing Remote control Always On Top window Support for deeplinks such as jitsi meet://myroom (will open myroom on the configured Jitsi instance) or jitsi meet://jitsi.mycompany.com/myroom (will open myroom on the Jitsi instance running on jitsi.mycompany.com ) Installation Download our latest release and you're off to the races! Third Party builds Homebrew For macOS users, you can install the application using the…
read the full jitsi-meet-electron overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chitchatter or jitsi-meet-electron more popular?
chitchatter has 2,344 GitHub stars and jitsi-meet-electron has 1,636. chitchatter has the larger community by that measure.
Are chitchatter and jitsi-meet-electron free?
Both are open source. chitchatter is licensed under GPL-2.0 and jitsi-meet-electron under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chitchatter and jitsi-meet-electron?
chitchatter is written in TypeScript and jitsi-meet-electron in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chitchatter or jitsi-meet-electron?
Choose chitchatter if you want the larger community (2,344 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose jitsi-meet-electron if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.