head to head · open source

Jan vs ChatALL

Jan has 44,512 GitHub stars, 3,032 forks, 521 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ChatALL has 16,496 stars, 1,723 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Jan leads on adoption by 170% (44,512 vs 16,496 stars). Jan is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; ChatALL is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Jan has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, ChatALL 10%. Jan was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatgpt), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jan ★ 45K ChatALL ★ 16K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jan ChatALL
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 16K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-11
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jan if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jan profile →

pick ChatALL if

  • You want the ChatALL feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and ChatALL fits your workflow better

full ChatALL profile →

About Jan

Jan is an open source desktop application that serves as a ChatGPT replacement, enabling users to run large language models (LLMs) locally on their machines or connect to cloud based providers like OpenAI and Anthropic. It is built with Tauri, TypeScript, and integrates llama.cpp for efficient local inference, targeting privacy conscious users who want full control over their AI workflows without sending data to third parties.

read the full Jan overview →

About ChatALL

ChatALL is an open source desktop application that sends one prompt to many AI bots concurrently so users can compare answers and discover the best result, and it is built for LLM gurus, LLM researchers, and developers of LLM applications.

read the full ChatALL overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs jan openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Jan vs OpenClaw Jan vs Hermes Agent Jan vs Open WebUI Jan vs LobeChat Jan vs AnythingLLM Jan vs Cherry Studio Jan vs nanobot Jan vs LibreChat Jan vs chatbox Jan vs AstrBot Jan vs openhuman Jan vs Langchain-Chatchat

Frequently asked questions

Is Jan or ChatALL more popular?

Jan has 44,512 GitHub stars and ChatALL has 16,496. Jan has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jan and ChatALL free?

Both are open source. Jan has no licence declared in this registry, and ChatALL is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Jan and ChatALL?

Jan is written in TypeScript and ChatALL in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jan or ChatALL?

Choose Jan if you want the larger community (44,512 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose ChatALL if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.