head to head · open source

Certipy vs Peergos

Certipy has 3,672 GitHub stars, 483 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Peergos has 2,524 stars, 199 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Certipy leads on adoption by 45% (3,672 vs 2,524 stars). Certipy is written in Python under MIT; Peergos is written in Java under AGPL-3.0. Certipy has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Peergos 8%. Peergos was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Certipy ★ 3.7K Peergos ★ 2.5K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Certipy Peergos
GitHub stars ★ 3.7K ★ 2.5K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-07-30 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 483 ⑂ 199
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Certipy if

  • You weight community size — 3.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Certipy profile →

pick Peergos if

  • You want the Peergos feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Peergos fits your workflow better

full Peergos profile →

About Certipy

Certipy is an open source Python toolkit, published under the MIT licence on PyPI as certipy ad , for enumerating and abusing Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS), built for red teamers, penetration testers, and defenders who need to assess AD CS misconfigurations in Windows Active Directory environments.

read the full Certipy overview →

About Peergos

Peergos is a peer to peer secure file storage system, social network, and application protocol built in Java under AGPL 3.0. It lives in the IPFS, IPLD, and libp2p ecosystem and supports a private web where users control their data, decide where it is stored, and determine who can see it. The project addresses centralized services that can track users, expose personal data, and observe relationships or file contents without cryptographic access control.

read the full Peergos overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Certipy vs Puter Certipy vs Mattermost Certipy vs Signal Certipy vs Ente Certipy vs Element Certipy vs Fluxer Certipy vs certificates Certipy vs Tuta Certipy vs Zen Certipy vs Cinny Certipy vs Stoat Certipy vs Quiet

Frequently asked questions

Is Certipy or Peergos more popular?

Certipy has 3,672 GitHub stars and Peergos has 2,524. Certipy has the larger community by that measure.

Are Certipy and Peergos free?

Both are open source. Certipy is licensed under MIT and Peergos under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Certipy and Peergos?

Certipy is written in Python and Peergos in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Certipy or Peergos?

Choose Certipy if you want the larger community (3,672 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Peergos if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.