head to head · open source
Browser Use vs wreq
Browser Use has 115,379 GitHub stars, 12,695 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. wreq has 1,027 stars, 124 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 11,135% (115,379 vs 1,027 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; wreq is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, wreq 12%. wreq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | wreq | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 115K | ★ 1.0K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 124 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 115K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wreq if
- You want the wreq feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and wreq fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Browser Use is an open source Python library and hosted platform that enables AI agents to control web browsers programmatically. It lives in the AI agent and browser automation ecosystem, built on Playwright and designed to let LLMs interact with websites as a human would—clicking, filling forms, solving CAPTCHAs, and navigating dynamic interfaces. The project provides three deployment paths: a fully hosted cloud service, a command line interface for existing agents, and a local Python library for custom integrations.
read the full Browser Use overview →
About wreq
wreq is an Apache 2.0 licensed Rust HTTP client that provides high fidelity protocol matching through customizable TLS, JA3/JA4, and HTTP/2 signature capabilities, and it is aimed at developers building crawlers, scrapers, and censorship resistant clients that need to look like real browsers on the wire.
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or wreq more popular?
Browser Use has 115,379 GitHub stars and wreq has 1,027. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and wreq free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and wreq under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and wreq?
Browser Use is written in Python and wreq in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or wreq?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (115,379 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose wreq if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.