head to head · open source
Browser Use vs wa-js
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wa-js has 832 stars, 252 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 14,306% (119,857 vs 832 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; wa-js is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, wa-js 30%. wa-js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | wa-js | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 832 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 252 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wa-js if
- You want the wa-js feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and wa-js fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About wa-js
English Português (Brasil) WPPConnect/WA JS Expose WhatsApp Web functions through the browser side WPP API. A project in the WPPConnect ecosystem, maintained by WPPConnect Team. Getting started Documentation Contributing Support WPPConnect Overview For extension and browser integration developers who need to execute code inside WhatsApp Web. The generated dist/wppconnect wa.js bundle exposes chat, contact, connection and other modules; it is not a Node.js WhatsApp client. Features Chat and media operations, groups, communities, channels and business catalog functions. Connection events, profile/privacy settings…
read the full wa-js overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or wa-js more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and wa-js has 832. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and wa-js free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and wa-js under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and wa-js?
Browser Use is written in Python and wa-js in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or wa-js?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose wa-js if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.