head to head · open source
Browser Use vs Vibe-Workflow
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Vibe-Workflow has 637 stars, 162 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 18,716% (119,857 vs 637 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; Vibe-Workflow is written in JavaScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Vibe-Workflow 25%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | Vibe-Workflow | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 637 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 162 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Vibe-Workflow if
- You want the Vibe-Workflow feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and Vibe-Workflow fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About Vibe-Workflow
Vibe Workflow — Open Source Alternative to Weavy AI, Freepik Spaces, Krea Nodes & FloraFauna AI Vibe Workflow is a free, open source node based AI workflow builder — the self hostable alternative to Weavy AI, Freepik Spaces, Krea Nodes, and FloraFauna AI. Designed around "Artistic Intelligence," it gives creators and developers a visual, modular pipeline editor for designing, editing, and composing AI generated images and video — with no vendor lock in. Read the full story: I built Open Weavy because paid AI creative tools were getting ridiculously expensive. 🚀 Prefer a hosted version? Try Vibe Workflow…
read the full Vibe-Workflow overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or Vibe-Workflow more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and Vibe-Workflow has 637. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and Vibe-Workflow free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and Vibe-Workflow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and Vibe-Workflow?
Browser Use is written in Python and Vibe-Workflow in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or Vibe-Workflow?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Vibe-Workflow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.