head to head · open source

Browser Use vs trustgraph

Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. trustgraph has 2,869 stars, 339 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 4,078% (119,857 vs 2,869 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; trustgraph is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, trustgraph 12%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Browser Use ★ 120K trustgraph ★ 2.9K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Browser Use trustgraph
GitHub stars ★ 120K ★ 2.9K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-28
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 339
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Browser Use if

  • You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Browser Use profile →

pick trustgraph if

  • You want the trustgraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and trustgraph fits your workflow better

full trustgraph profile →

About Browser Use

Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…

read the full Browser Use overview →

About trustgraph

HyperGraph Playground Self Host TrustGraph Docs YouTube Discord Website The Context Orchestration Layer for Agentic AI Open Source · Open Standards · Total Transparency TrustGraph is an open source context orchestration layer designed to power the next generation of enterprise AI. AI applications fail without shared context. LLMs are powerful, but without a structured, unified context layer — one that bridges silos, captures complex relationships, and enforces governance — agents hallucinate, violate policies, and produce non deterministic outcomes. TrustGraph builds that layer. It uses hypergraphs to turn raw…

read the full trustgraph overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Browser Use or trustgraph more popular?

Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and trustgraph has 2,869. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.

Are Browser Use and trustgraph free?

Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and trustgraph under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Browser Use and trustgraph?

Browser Use is written in Python and trustgraph in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Browser Use or trustgraph?

Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose trustgraph if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.