head to head · open source
Browser Use vs synology-api
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. synology-api has 608 stars, 168 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 19,613% (119,857 vs 608 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; synology-api is written in Python under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, synology-api 28%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | synology-api | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 608 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 168 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick synology-api if
- You want the synology-api feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and synology-api fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About synology-api
Synology Wrapper If you find yourself here, most probably you are trying to develop something for your NAS, this wrapper might come to your help to build your script. I would like to specify that I do this for hobby as is my passion and in my little free time. Said this, there is no warranties chained and this library is provided "As Is", you will find many things can be simplified, and I slowly will but feel free to Contribute. Premise I've tried this wrapper only with python3 . I do not know if it actually runs with previous versions Before opening an issue make sure you do your own research, if you are not…
read the full synology-api overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or synology-api more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and synology-api has 608. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and synology-api free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and synology-api under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and synology-api?
Browser Use is written in Python and synology-api in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or synology-api?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose synology-api if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.