head to head · open source
Browser Use vs Stealth-Requests
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Stealth-Requests has 567 stars, 57 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 21,060% (119,977 vs 567 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; Stealth-Requests is written in Python under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Stealth-Requests 10%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | Stealth-Requests | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 567 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 57 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Stealth-Requests if
- You want the Stealth-Requests feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Stealth-Requests fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About Stealth-Requests
The Easiest Way to Scrape the Web Features Realistic HTTP Requests: Mimics Chrome browser for undetected scraping using curl cffi Automatically rotates User Agents between requests Tracks and updates the Referer header to simulate realistic request chains Built in retry logic for failed requests (e.g. 429, 503, 522) Faster and Easier Parsing: Extract emails, phone numbers, images, and links from responses Automatically extract metadata (title, description, author, etc.) from HTML based responses Seamlessly convert responses into Lxml and BeautifulSoup objects for more parsing Easily convert full or specific…
read the full Stealth-Requests overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or Stealth-Requests more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and Stealth-Requests has 567. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and Stealth-Requests free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and Stealth-Requests under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and Stealth-Requests?
Browser Use is written in Python and Stealth-Requests in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or Stealth-Requests?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Stealth-Requests if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.