head to head · open source
Browser Use vs spook
Browser Use has 115,022 GitHub stars, 12,661 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. spook has 1,292 stars, 91 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 8,803% (115,022 vs 1,292 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; spook is written in Python under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, spook 7%. spook was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | spook | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 115K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 91 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 115K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick spook if
- You want the spook feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and spook fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Browser Use is an open source Python library and hosted platform that enables AI agents to control web browsers programmatically. It lives in the AI agent and browser automation ecosystem, built on Playwright and designed to let LLMs interact with websites as a human would—clicking, filling forms, solving CAPTCHAs, and navigating dynamic interfaces. The project provides three deployment paths: a fully hosted cloud service, a command line interface for existing agents, and a local Python library for custom integrations.
read the full Browser Use overview →
About spook
Spook 👻 Your homie. [![GitHub Release][releases shield]][releases] ![Project Stage][project stage shield] [![License][license shield]](LICENSE.md) ![Project Maintenance][maintenance shield] [![Coverage][codecov shield]][codecov] [![OpenSSF Scorecard][scorecard shield]][scorecard] About Hi! I'm Spook 👻 and I'm a custom integration for use with Home Assistant. I will extend your Home Assistant instance with a huge set of scary powerful tools. 🛠️ Learn all about me in the extensive documentation ⚠️ Just to be very clear... Spook is not affiliated with, endorsed, recommended, or supported by the Home Assistant pro…
read the full spook overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or spook more popular?
Browser Use has 115,022 GitHub stars and spook has 1,292. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and spook free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and spook under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and spook?
Browser Use is written in Python and spook in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or spook?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (115,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose spook if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.